GG NL2 cash games rake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neverbluff0799
  • Start date Start date
That sucks! You can play through it I'm sure 🙂

Fun bit of info by the way, from EP, AQo isn't a mandatory call facing a three bet. Solver likes to 4bet 50% or fold, it doesn't like flat calling OOP from EP. But obviously this has variables depending on our opponent. That is just the theory.

Good luck at the tables.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fundiver199
Bad luck. It happens quite a bit to me. I just laugh now and move on to the next suck out 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: neverbluff0799
padman400 said:
Bad luck. It happens quite a bit to me. I just laugh now and move on to the next suck out 🤣
Was my turn to be lucky today 😀

1785353253877

Another positive they boosted by 2 cooler AA vs 10 10 where i runer runner a flush vs is flop set and AK vs QQ winning both run our 🙂
 
Little update after 20k hands :

1785353618883

still around 20 bb/100bb for now 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: padman400
neverbluff0799 said:
Saying i run bad today would be an understatement lol
Running 200BB below all-in adjusted EV is not that special really. It only require a few bad beats like losing an all-in with KK against QQ etc. Over a larger sample that gap can become significantly wider like 2.000BB or more. It just is, what it is, since its a part of the game, we have zero control over 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: neverbluff0799
For someone who's new to cash games, I'd say that's a solid start. 18k hands isn't a huge sample, but if you're winning after that many hands, you're probably doing something right.

As for the rake, it's hard to estimate without seeing the graph or your database stats. At NL2, you've likely paid a decent chunk in rake- possibly even more than your $74 profit over 18k hands. The good news is that if you're still winning after rake, that's a positive sign. Just keep building the sample before drawing any big conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: padman400, fundiver199 and neverbluff0799
Back
Top