Logan2
Legend
Silver Level
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Total posts
- 4,054
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #4,626
oh, and welcome back Alfie, after all you start this thread
/Logan/ said:oh, and welcome back Alfie, after all you start this thread
Wintz said:Got shoved on today on a queen high board with 3 diamonds. i had King Queen of diamonds and he had seven-four of diamonds for a straight flush. :/ it was his first hand also
I think it's funny that this post came before an introduction to the forums.Wintz said:Got shoved on today on a queen high board with 3 diamonds. i had King Queen of diamonds and he had seven-four of diamonds for a straight flush. :/ it was his first hand also
BenjiHustle said:I think it's funny that this post came before an introduction to the forums.
Wintz said:Got shoved on today on a queen high board with 3 diamonds. i had King Queen of diamonds and he had seven-four of diamonds for a straight flush. :/ it was his first hand also
BenjiHustle said:I think it's funny that this post came before an introduction to the forums.
BenjiHustle said:He was mixing it up.
Didn't wanna be too polarizing.
youregoodmate said:I don't like 3 betting this type of hand out of the blinds. A merged range is far better when we are going to be playing the hands out of position and using a wider value 3 bet range. This type of hand just misses boards far too often and has little semi-bluffing equity.
Im surprised a reg like this doesn't fold the river there. You always have the nut flush or better when you over-shove. Therefore, I don't really like the over-shove as under most circumstances we are only getting called by better.
youregoodmate said:Yes we beat all flushes but most regs will be folding the K flush here. Apparently this guy is a drooler or on tilt.
What does the 3 bet bluff have to do with this hand? It was the hero that 3 bet... Villains 3 bet is irrelevant.
Speedexas said:What i wanted to say is that we (HERO) sometimes 3bet light , we all do that from time to time.
We dont beat 10 J hearts though.
youregoodmate said:Oh I see your point. I'm an aggro tard so I 3 bet from the blinds a lot. My point was A9o is a shit hand to do it with imo because we are going to get flatted a good chunk of the time and it plays shit oop.
I'd rather 3 bet a merged range from the blinds than a polarised one.
Scourrge said:Doesn't this 100% depend on villain? But against most standard regs I agree.
ScottishMatt said:PokerStars - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 105.2 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 2)
SB: 184.6 BB
Hero (BB): 100 BB
UTG: 101 BB (VPIP: 25.00, PFR: 25.00, 3Bet Preflop: 33.33, Hands: 4)
MP: 312.8 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
CO: 110 BB
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has A<font color='black'>♣</font> Q<font color='black'>♣</font>
fold, MP raises to 3 BB, CO calls 3 BB, fold, SB calls 2.6 BB, Hero raises to 14 BB, fold, CO raises to 39 BB, fold, Hero ?
Villain is 1 tabling so I assume a fish.
Scourrge said:Doesn't this 100% depend on villain? But against most standard regs I agree.