aa88wildbill
Visionary
Silver Level
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Total posts
- 647
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #26
I personally like Bovada but, it takes some getting used to. Once you get used to it, it's not bad.
snklzona said:I agree that ACR software is a joke and their MTT selection is not very good...this is to bad cause I find the competion softer there than anywhere else....
absoluthamm said:Then why not stop complaining and just play there?
Demonomania said:+1
Are you trying to find a pretty table to play at or crush?
Blobweird123 said:Its not cosmetic. Its bugs that steer me away. Bugs that cost me money.
Blobweird123 said:Couldn't disagree more. Being able to learn your opponents through history has ALWAYS been a part of poker, live or online. That won't change. Bovada is on its own there and probably will remain that way.
If i've seen you 5bet 50 times and you've ONLY shown down with AA, then its safe to say when you just 5bet me that you have AA and im dominated. This can happen in live just as easily if you're attentive to detail and have a good memory. So you wouldn't use that to your advantage? You'd rather just go in blind every hand and never have a range for villain? Flawed thinking...
pfb8888 said:how many hands would you have to see that i 5 bet aa 50 times..?
Just a random example. But really, if we're at the same home game or casino often, there's no reason I wouldn't learn your stats through time is there? Unless i'm lazy and don't bother to remember. Obv not gonna be down to exact VPIP/PFR/AF/3bet in CO vs a raise from UTG, but we will have a range for opponent, plus an idea of how he plays certain hands IP/OOP, Vs raise, vs 3bet etc etc
by using trackers and having access to other software and coaching and forums
poker has become too competitive to overcome the rake...especially in the usa..without most recreational players.
the bubble has burst on this pyramid...like the gold rush atmosphere...the small minority who get in on something early profit then the rest grind hard for crumbs
here's a possible idea ...make poker like a home game...rent the virtual table for a set fee and block of time...higher stakes equals lower rake %...off hours = cheaper rates...
a dedicated 2 or 4 or more hour ring tournament.(blinds stay the same thruout)..with some kind of penalty for quitting so there is no break up of the game..
sort of the opposite of rush poker...the challenge being to play and adapt to unknown players...
pfb8888 said:here's a possible idea ...make poker like a home game...rent the virtual table for a set fee and block of time...higher stakes equals lower rake %...off hours = cheaper rates...
a dedicated 2 or 4 or more hour ring tournament.(blinds stay the same thruout)..with some kind of penalty for quitting so there is no break up of the game.. .
dj11 said:This reminded me of a product that made the threads here a couple of years ago. It was essentially a cardless, dealerless live poker table played with a mouse (or dedicated buttons) and separate vid screens. So you or I could sit at this table, with other live bodies, and still have most of the conveniences of internet poker, yet the fun of live poker. IIRC, we poo poo'ed the notion at that time.