Which game do you prefer? Hold'em, Omaha...give your opinion.

  • Thread starter Thread starter AvaPoker13
  • Start date Start date
As a MTT player I would prefer Omaha Hi-Lo (NL pref but PL is ok too). But because there is so few good O8 MTTs, I have to play most of the time best value Texas MTTs.
 
I like them both lol I have found that when I am running bad switching over to Omaha will help me focus more and in the end, ends up helping out my NLHE game a lot.
 
Anyone here ever play PLO live? I'm planning on trying it soon. A nearby casino has a 1/3 table on Thursdays.

Are live PLO tables filled with regs?
 
I like holdem because it's easy. One more plus of holdem it's great number of players. You can always choose tournament with buy-in you like, strukture or other things.
But mix-games is very interesting too. I like HORSE, 8-games and 10-games tournament. You never know, where you can win or lose here. Beside it's a good way to learn playig different types of poker.
 
Hold'em, but if I had the bankroll that could handle the variance and a little more time to dedicate to study Hi/Lo is a helluva lot of fun.
 
Omaha is my favorite game for the wide variety of game that you have
 
Only know how to play hold'em. I also have no interest in learning Omaha, I find it boring.
 
NL Holdem, lately had registred to tournament which turned out to be omaha 😛 too complicated
 
I like them both. When I play HE and have a dry period for a time I switch to Omaha Hi and there I usually make a good profit. I do not know why but it works 🙂
 
Omaha especially Omaha 8 because you need to think all the time, not just fold all but premium hands
Much more fun
 
I prefer holdem because is more easier than omaha is little complicated. More funny and interesant holdem... 🙂
 
You want to play - open any online poker room. And you will always find the table or tournament hold'em. In other disciplines much more difficult - you need to choose a time to play.
 
I like them both, but I much prefer holdem. Omaha is on another level than holdem. Hands you would go all in with in holdem, are hands that you go broke on in Omaha.
 
Like most of all I like the Hold ° em , for the simple reason that it is much more attractively landscaped , entertaining and easier, Omaha bores me , it does not have the effect produced by the first , but there is for every taste person

Excuse my translation , I do not understand the English
 
I play hold'em, there are always cash tables, you can not say about Omaha. In hold'em session longer I go playing in Omaha you get tired faster and my head starts to hurt.
 
I prefer playing No Limit Hold'em,but sometimes I like to play Omaha freerolls and that is usually when there aren't many people registered in them.
 
Hold'em because in another game I'm still in beginning
* played Omaha, but could not great results
then I prefer to play only one game
 
rytciaq said:
No Limit Holdem, because it is the most dominant game of poker, requires more discipline than Omaha and is more simple and fun for me.
Click to expand...

Maybe this may sound silly, but i have the same impression.
 
I when I lost my whole banking for the first time decided to learn other types of poker , and Omaha was included . I started playing with fictitious chip on PokerStars and 1,000 chips spent PRRA 86,000 in less than 1 hour , deceive me with this result . When I started to ride my new banking dde decided to venture into Omaha real money , I repented , have to be much more study than I thought it was , what happened to me with fictitious chips was luck, lol .
 
Back
Top