R
rhombus
Legend
Silver Level
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Total posts
- 2,601
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #51
If you like to gamble then PLO all the way, if you can't handle the swings then NLHE
bigjay2007 said:I truly enjoy both games. Mainly pot limit Omaha, not the high low. I find it nice to switch things up as all NL tables can get boring at times. Another game I really like is 5 card draw. Just like the old days around the kitchen table.
Rational Madman said:Hold'em allows everyone the most information so only the skilled can prosper. Omaha allowed much more blindness and variance.
PLO is far more volatile than holdem. If you cannot handle big swings, then Holdem is definitely a better game for youwilpinsi said:What would be your specialty when playing poker, in which of these modes would you be in the lead? We see people saying that hold'em is the most widespread, and that there are more championships all over the world, so I ask why then people say they prefer Omaha, which is much more profitable, say that in Omaha their losses do not Are as expressive as it is when you're playing Hold'em, is that statement really true?
So let's look at the opinion of all of you if actually playing Omaha is better than Hold'em.
And the most important of all ... Who is used to Hold'em, can be profitable with Omaha? Is it different from other strategies to succeed?
The popularity of Omaha is on the rise, with many players opting for the full package of action that Omaha offers instead of Texas Hold'em primarily Hi-Lo Pot Limit Omaha or Omaha High Low ?????
Knowing of this statement, can we say that Omaha is as good as Hold'em?
robcubus said:I usualy play Hold em, but I must admit that I would like to learn to play more Omaha. Any tips on how to get started?