kleitches said:
I do run a little better at PS than FTP at 100nl. 6 or 7BB/100 at PS instead of a little less than 4 at FTP, iirc. But i only have something like 10k hands at that level at PS, so it's not really relevant, could just be i run hot there.
95% of my 200nl I have played at FTP. Not entirely confortable moving up to 200nl at PS, mostly because not having any hands on the regs sucks. But the tables do look a lot less appealing there from their general stats. Also, I love the deep tables at FTP.
The general consensus having asked a few regs between the sites is that the 100nl+ tables are juicer because there's no SNE grinders bogging down the tables at Full Tilt. Interesting to think about.
And I want my money back for pokerazor lol (It's free) ... I plugged in my tragic last hand from last night and it said at the turn (when I stacked) that "My hand is best 100% of the time" with top set on a 4-7-J-8 board (I had JJ). Villain showed 56o. lol, so yeah that's poker ...
Anyways ... the Full Tilt vs Pokerstars debate is kind of interesting. I mean late at night when I play (say midnight PST) the table VPIPs are *lucky* to be over 17 at full ring. Which to me is super nitty. Not sure what FTP tables run at.
And I want my money back for pokerazor lol (It's free) ... I plugged in my tragic last hand from last night and it said at the turn (when I stacked) that "My hand is best 100% of the time" with top set on a 4-7-J-8 board (I had JJ). Villain showed 56o. lol, so yeah that's poker ...
Anyways ... the Full Tilt vs Pokerstars debate is kind of interesting. I mean late at night when I play (say midnight PST) the table VPIPs are *lucky* to be over 17 at full ring. Which to me is super nitty. Not sure what FTP tables run at.
I posted this earlier, but basically, if you compare the top winners for 100nl and 200nl
http://www.pokertableratings.com/topwinners.php?site=&structure=1&stakes=1&timeframe=year
http://www.pokertableratings.com/topwinners.php?site=&structure=1&stakes=2&timeframe=year
you get mostly PS players for 100nl and FTP players for 200nl in the top positions. I do believe it means 100nl is softer at PS and 200nl softer at FTP.
http://www.pokertableratings.com/topwinners.php?site=&structure=1&stakes=1&timeframe=year
http://www.pokertableratings.com/topwinners.php?site=&structure=1&stakes=2&timeframe=year
you get mostly PS players for 100nl and FTP players for 200nl in the top positions. I do believe it means 100nl is softer at PS and 200nl softer at FTP.
FFS can you guys update your goddamn blogs? What's the point of having one if you update it once every six years. I want to read about people's poker progress when I'm on the shitter and the last update I see is from June 17, 1974. I'm talking to you Zach, Jagsti, Vanq, and others you know who you are.
This guy is walking ATM..
he keeps reloading YSY
MP2: $27.81 (111.2 bb)
MP3: $49.05 (196.2 bb)
CO: $25 (100 bb)
BTN: $48.95 (195.8 bb)
SB: $20.95 (83.8 bb)
BB: $25 (100 bb)
UTG+1: $24.43 (97.7 bb)
UTG+2: $25 (100 bb)
MP1: $72.70 (290.8 bb)
Pre-Flop:
2 folds, MP1 raises to $1.25, 3 folds, BTN raises to $48.95 and is all-in, 2 folds, MP1 calls $47.70
Flop: ($98.25) J:heart: T:spade: T:club: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: ($98.25) 7:spade: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: ($98.25) 9:diamond: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Results: $98.25 pot ($3 rake)
BTN showed 2:club: 8:spade: (a straight, Seven to Jack) and won $95.25 ($46.30 net)
MP1 showed Q:club: Q:heart: (two pairs, Queens and Tens) and lost (-$48.95 net)
he keeps reloading YSY
MP2: $27.81 (111.2 bb)
MP3: $49.05 (196.2 bb)
CO: $25 (100 bb)
BTN: $48.95 (195.8 bb)
SB: $20.95 (83.8 bb)
BB: $25 (100 bb)
UTG+1: $24.43 (97.7 bb)
UTG+2: $25 (100 bb)
MP1: $72.70 (290.8 bb)
Pre-Flop:
2 folds, MP1 raises to $1.25, 3 folds, BTN raises to $48.95 and is all-in, 2 folds, MP1 calls $47.70
Flop: ($98.25) J:heart: T:spade: T:club: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: ($98.25) 7:spade: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: ($98.25) 9:diamond: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Results: $98.25 pot ($3 rake)
BTN showed 2:club: 8:spade: (a straight, Seven to Jack) and won $95.25 ($46.30 net)
MP1 showed Q:club: Q:heart: (two pairs, Queens and Tens) and lost (-$48.95 net)
First set in 300hands.
Villains second hand at table, he bought in short,posted OOP and then stacked my AJ<J8.
Im still swiming in the $ this month so F it 🙂.
Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
SB: $25 (100 bb)
BB: $30.45 (121.8 bb)
Hero (UTG): $25 (100 bb)
MP: $28.15 (112.6 bb)
CO: $20.95 (83.8 bb)
BTN: $12.10 (48.4 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is UTG with 7
7
Hero raises to $1, MP calls $1, 4 folds
Flop: ($2.35) 2
5
K
(2 players)
Hero bets $1.75, MP calls $1.75
Turn: ($5.85) 7
(2 players)
Hero bets $4.50, MP calls $4.50
River: ($14.85) 4
(2 players)
Hero bets $17.75 and is all-in, MP calls $17.75
Results: $50.35 pot ($2.45 rake)
Hero showed 7
7
(three of a kind, Sevens) and lost (-$25 net)
MP showed A
3
(a straight, Ace to Five) and won $47.90 ($22.90 net)
Villains second hand at table, he bought in short,posted OOP and then stacked my AJ<J8.
Im still swiming in the $ this month so F it 🙂.
Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
SB: $25 (100 bb)
BB: $30.45 (121.8 bb)
Hero (UTG): $25 (100 bb)
MP: $28.15 (112.6 bb)
CO: $20.95 (83.8 bb)
BTN: $12.10 (48.4 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is UTG with 7
Hero raises to $1, MP calls $1, 4 folds
Flop: ($2.35) 2
Hero bets $1.75, MP calls $1.75
Turn: ($5.85) 7
Hero bets $4.50, MP calls $4.50
River: ($14.85) 4
Hero bets $17.75 and is all-in, MP calls $17.75
Results: $50.35 pot ($2.45 rake)
Hero showed 7
MP showed A