s0ftdumps said:
I kind of agree with the old Freeools saying: every time you move up in stakes, it's a new game. Building $50 into $500 at 2NL is an accomplishment, but that doesn't automatically mean you can do the same thing at 10NL or 25NL. The player pool changes, the mistakes get smaller, and the bankroll swings get bigger.
Moving up can definitely be a challenge. I posted elsewhere about the difficulties, I experienced back in 2020-2021 on 888 Poker, when I tried to dip my toes into mid-stakes ($22-55) MTTs after having having pretty much crushed everything on the site with a buyin up to $16.5. As a short recap I lost around 100 BIs over just 200 games, which was almost certainly a bad run but not entirely due to variance.
And its important to notice, when we might have hit our skill ceiling and moving up further without first improving will put our winning track record at risk. Its a simple truth, that if we are not beating the games, we play in, then no amount of bankroll will protect us from eventually losing all our money, unless we either stop playing, change our game selection or improve.
The headline of this thread is kind of funny, because it ask, what is the smallest bankroll, someone build, and the answer to that would obviously be zero AKA going broke. What OP actually mean, is, what is the smallest amount, someone build a bankroll
from. And in my opinion that question get way to much attention in this forum. It would be far more interesting to ask, that is the biggest amount, someone build a bankroll
to, and were still able to beat the games, this bankroll then allowed them to play.
I have won something like $25-30k in
online poker over the years on different sites. But if I cant beat anything above $16.5 MTTs, I only need a bankroll of maybe 2k to continue playing the games, I am beating. So the question of bankroll building often gets far to much attention at the expense of skill building, which in the end will be, what limit the vast majority of poker players.