BelgoSuisse said:there's a black horizontal line labelled $0. That's the one you should compare with if you want to know if you're seeing a profit or not...
No. you can't have r+b < (r+b)/2 and still have r+b > 0. Think about it.
Jurn8 said:this at 6max wtf ! Surely you cant be thinking about your decisions and assigning ranges to villians etc etc 6max requires alot more thought about plays than FR because of there are alot more marginal spots.
I dont think you can play your A game play this many tables of 6max, iv heard its really tough to do 10 let alone 17.
BelgoSuisse said:+1
of course, as he's playing super micro stakes, he does not need to think about marginal spots. Just getting value from your big hands and folding everything else works fine.
Of course, you don't really learn and improve playing that kind of robotic poker, so it does not prepare you properly to move up, which is terrible in a long term perspective.
D'wilius said:Welcome, MrMc. I've been trying to work on playing position better myself. I'm also pretty nitty playing only 18% of hands at 6max. I thinkdouble barreling is just cbetting and following with another bet on the turn.
Cardplayer, yes 20BB/100 is sustainable at 2nl which is in fact 80c/100, about a penny per hand...just multitable.
...oh, so that would be 25k hands, but you'd be rolled to move up before then..
Deltafrost said:Anyone up for setting some group sweats up or regular sweats in general? I'm pretty worthless at FR i think but I'll do those too.
Ideally maybe have the person being sweated make a vid without audio and then 2 others talk through with the player about the hands. Allows us to pause video for more discussion.
cardplayer52 said:thanks i firgured it right but it just seemed off. i guess the next limit for me would be 5NL as i play at fulltilt. so i'm figuring i would need a roll of atleast $100 for that. ok for my next question would be how many hands can you average an hour? i'm guessing around 40 does that sound about right?
I average just over 60 hands/hr per table, and I play full ring.cardplayer52 said:ok for my next question would be how many hands can you average an hour? i'm guessing around 40 does that sound about right?
eNTy said:That would be really cool and similar to a thing they're doing on DC for micro stakes players (25nl & 50nl) tubasteve + another coach take like 8 students for a group session.
It would be cool if this got off the ground possibly a good midstakes reg sweating a microstakes and then the entire group discussing it ?
Only problem being that there might not be enough interesting hands to talk about ..
cardplayer52 said:i got a question about the win rate at 2NL. i read that 40bb/100 or 20BB/100 is within reach. so would that be 80 cents over a hundred hands? or would it be like 8 cents a hand? and how many hands would it be to make $200? i way confused i think. please if someone could help out i greatly appreciate it ty.
cAPSLOCK said:I am a fairly casual player, and only single table or sometimes 2-table. I have ~30k hands recorded at 02nl (I also play higher penny stakes on full moons). It took me about 21k hands to record a $200 gain.
My overall winrate at 02nl is ~45bb/100 so, yes you can sustain a high bb/100 down here.
The common suggestion of playing solid TAG poker and betting the turn and river for value is solid advice. There ARE other ways you can profit at 02nl though.. just like all the levels. 😉
One thing, in my very humble opinion, you mustn't do is underestimate the game. Of course 02nl is FILLED with horrible players, but poker is poker. You have to understand who you are up against in the same way you would need to if you were playing $50/100. It's just the pain is far more palatable down here. 😉
RogueRivered said:Nice post. Can you share your blue (SD) and red (NSD) winnings with us? I'm still trying to get a handle on what mine mean. See my graph several posts up.
kleitches said:Rogue, I saw you earlier on the tables when I was donking around at 2nl, I shouted out "CARDSCHAT!" in the chatbox but you must not have seen it. 😛
But anyway dude, your red line going way the hell down is completely normal. All it means is that you're not winning many non-showdown pots (obviously) which is expected at your stake. Do not worry about trying to make that line positive, it will NEVER happen at 2nl. Or 5nl. Or 10nl. Or even 25nl. Your red and blue lines on your graph should have an inverse relationship because it just means you are value betting your good hands all the way to showdown and winning, and contrarily you are giving up on marginal hands before showdown. People like Belgo have positive red lines because they are double and triple barreling, check-raising, and doing moves that are a bit more sophisticated than what is necessary for the micros.
Cliffsnotes: Downward sloping red-line on your graph at the micros: good.
kleitches said:People like Belgo have positive red lines because they are double and triple barreling, check-raising, and doing moves that are a bit more sophisticated than what is necessary for the micros.
Jurn8 said:yo mo fo's I have a 50nl video I recorded last week if we need a vid to discuss?
Upload to blib.Jurn8 said:yo mo fo's I have a 50nl video I recorded last week if we need a vid to discuss?
dsvw56 said:I beg to differ.
I have a break even red line as well.kleitches said:Okay, well not all of us can be micro limit superstars like you, dsvw. 😛