AdelsonFagundes
Rock Star
Platinum Level
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2023
- Total posts
- 154
- Poker Chips
- 125
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
Speak up, bunch!
Today there are poker courses for all levels, and technical content has never been more accessible. But I'm always left with a question.
I have seen players who have taken several courses, are fluent in GTO, ICM and hand analysis, but are still looking for the first big score. At the same time, I know people who learned in practice, with volume and their own study, and achieved great results.
This makes me wonder: does a course teach only the technique?
In my view, it accelerates evolution and avoids many errors, but it doesn't buy experience, it doesn't control the emotional, it doesn't reduce variance, much less guarantee results.
In the end, perhaps the biggest difference lies in the discipline to study, play, review hands and continue to evolve even during downswings.
And you, what do you think? Does a good course really change a player's level, or does table experience remain the greatest teacher?
Today there are poker courses for all levels, and technical content has never been more accessible. But I'm always left with a question.
I have seen players who have taken several courses, are fluent in GTO, ICM and hand analysis, but are still looking for the first big score. At the same time, I know people who learned in practice, with volume and their own study, and achieved great results.
This makes me wonder: does a course teach only the technique?
In my view, it accelerates evolution and avoids many errors, but it doesn't buy experience, it doesn't control the emotional, it doesn't reduce variance, much less guarantee results.
In the end, perhaps the biggest difference lies in the discipline to study, play, review hands and continue to evolve even during downswings.
And you, what do you think? Does a good course really change a player's level, or does table experience remain the greatest teacher?









