sindri_93 said:I know, and this wasnt just a joke. I actualy played some .50/1 and 1/2 limit today😱.
It was horrible...
horrible in what sense? bad play or frustrating?
sindri_93 said:I know, and this wasnt just a joke. I actualy played some .50/1 and 1/2 limit today😱.
It was horrible...
Horrible players and frustratingly slow.Jurn8 said:horrible in what sense? bad play or frustrating?
sindri_93 said:Horrible players and frustratingly slow.
But i did get a bunch of points and was up like 30$ so that makes it a litle better.
bgomez89 said:anyone play Train, The S on pokerstars 2nl?
Yeah im sure i could 15-20 table FR limit but have trouble doing more then 8nl so yeah probably a good way to get the VPPs u need for the UK promo.Jurn8 said:slow? So that means mass multi tabling I may play some as I want to build VPPs quicker this month.
EDIT: No I wont
sindri_93 said:In other news i played some HU .50/1$ limit just now cause today if been experamenting with all sorts of games and i got owned😱
"train, the S" is a player on pokerstars and i was wondering if anyone else has played him beforeJurn8 said:sorry??
bgomez89 said:"train, the S" is a player on pokerstars and i was wondering if anyone else has played him before
Jurn8 said:the may bonus you get at concierge rate which i think is something like 1.4c/fpp it could be the other way around so dont quote me. Its up to you if you can cash in all 4 thats 44 bucks rather than 16.
I got all the may bonus $$ because of the rate we were getting them at but if you dont have that many fpp's then probably just keep going for the 210fpp sattys
Jagsti said:OBV you suck at maths!
1.6c/fpp!
$160 = 10k fpps .. 160/10,000 = 0.016 x 100 = 1.6c
$16 = 1k fpps..... 16/1000 = 0.016 x 100 = 1.6c
$8 = 500 fpps...... 8/500 = 0.016 x 100 = 1.6c
Report: Jake must try harder 😛
Jurn8 said:I am not moving up with a winrate of only 1.33BB at 50NL thats just idiotic IMO.
BelgoSuisse said:So i'm idiotic?
My winrate at 100nl has been significantly better (in BB/100) than at 50nl, and my winrate at 200nl is significantly better than at 100nl.
Jagsti said:Err yeah 😛!
Taking it into context, jake is still pretty raw, and moving up to 100nl too early is probably not a wise move imo. But it's all relative, and ppl will do things differently. as long as the person is properly bankrolled and has a good BRM strategy then yeah moving up/taking shots if certainly acceptable.
Jagsti said:Err yeah 😛!
Taking it into context, jake is still pretty new to cash, and moving up to 100nl too early is probably not a wise move imo. But it's all relative, and ppl will do things differently. as long as the person is properly bankrolled and has a good BRM strategy then yeah moving up/taking shots if certainly acceptable.
BelgoSuisse said:Jake is still pretty raw? 😕 I'm quite sure he's played more hands than i have. FWIW, i've played 10k hands at 10nl, about 60k hands at each of the next levels (25, 50 and 100nl) and something like 40k hands at 200nl so far. That's 230k hands overall.
Jagsti said:Well he's had good winrates at 10nl, 25nl and now he's at 50nl his winrate is flatting out a little. His confidence as a result has reduced, so why would he consider moving up? Dunno, I'm sure he'll answer it himself!
Jurn8 said:I mean belgo tbh I am only what 5 months into cash grinding properly and I think from what people have experienced 100nl is the first noticeable jump and then 200nl the first big jump.
BelgoSuisse said:tbh, i think that 100nl is actually easier than 50nl. it's full of mediocre regs who are super predictable and the rake is lower.