amonlima said:
So, I'm not saying that it won't be interesting to read a book about poker, but from the point of view of the technical part of the game, it's deficient. There's a lot of good content out there on the internet for free, which will give you a better knowledge.
amonlima said:
I have to laugh at your allegations, do you have something against me? envy ? something like that ? I don't understand this persecution you're having with me. Man tell me a professional who recommends books? poker is a game for people that changes over time, as players evolve and some moves are no longer profitable, what we call exploits, where field studies are always done using software, where we study the part theory vs the field and then we see where we can explore the field. This is how real poker is studied, but everything using software to study pre and post flop, icm situations, that is, I know what I'm talking about, I have experience with high stakes professionals, and that I can tell you stating none of them will refer you to books. You're saying I'm disheartened, but why? I'm adding here bringing my experience gained in a few years of poker, I see this as a pain in the neck on your part. And I'm not trying to sell a course or anything like that, I made a suggestion just for a poker team, but I saw that it's not allowed here, so I respected it and didn't try to suggest more. And about the strategy forum, I'm not aware of it yet, but I'll try to post there. And what's the problem if someone here wants to pay me for training? I have good experience in the micro limit, and ability to change people's game, so don't give me that.
Thanks for your feedback. I like you very much and was trying to help you, sorry if there was a misunderstanding. I agree to you, most of Poker theory and methodology is software based.
I never thought you would be offended because I have called you a regular instead of a professional.
I myself would love to be a regular, which I’m not. I’m just a poker fish in my way of learning and my profits are preposterous, it is clear to me that you are a higher player, and if anyone doubts of your skills, just take a look into your nickname in
sharkscope.
I’m not hunting you, I just thought you were playing Brazilian smart way, i.e, instead of posting a link you are asking for private messages, but whatever, I admit it was my mistake, and I’m pretty dumb and clueless, I should have measured my words properly dear Brazilian comrade.
I hope you forgive me for my mistake, all the best for you!
amonlima said:
So, I'm not saying that it won't be interesting to read a book about poker, but from the point of view of the technical part of the game, it's deficient. There's a lot of good content out there on the internet for free, which will give you a better knowledge.
Although I disagree with your opinion, I will fully respect it. It is good that players and forum users disagree on their opinions, thus all of us can have a larger perspective on poker and life.
Thanks for your attention and for your respect, because you calmly disagree without raising a contend or a fight, and I appreciate it very much.
I like books and I would love to read the opinions of other poker players who use to write books until today, for example professor John Anhalt
@John A and Nathan “blackrain79” Williams
@Nathan Williams.
Once again, thanks a lot for your kindness, patience and contribution.
www.cardschat.com
