So calm down - something unusual would be if you have two QQ and the table comes up with three QQQ on the flopZenonBR said:
Only a green belly would raise such a stupid question.😁🤣🤣ZenonBR said:
In our age of technology, you can't be sure that the RNG in all poker rooms is not rigged. For small poker rooms, this may be the only way to survive.ZenonBR said:
César @Gritz18 hahaha what can I say about you my friend, with all your poker concepts, with your raising plays and the idea of not limping just because you learned that Rafael Moraes said we should never limp in poker, yes I do I learned this from him too, but I don't use it in microstakes or even in freerolls because it doesn't work at that level, you need to transcend my friend, evolve and not get stuck in theories just because you learned what is "right or wrong" in poker, transcend, think for yourself, don't follow cake recipes, don't get stuck in ideologies, transcend your mind and think for yourself, sometimes I am amused by your lamentations, other times I feel sorry, I just hope you can overcome all this and trying to become a better player.Gritz18 said:
and yet MANY people are.luckyfish98 said:
I'd suggest learning why limping is bad instead of spending time on a witch hunt for peculiar run outs of cards (or whatever you were suggesting in initial post).ZenonBR said:
complete nonsense of a grey mare... the room earns from the commission for buy-in in tournaments and rake in cash... and what does the twist of the random number generator have to do with it? well, they screwed up, and what's next, what difference does it make to them who was eliminated from the tournament, you or me? if we paid the same for participating in the tournament? it's just that some people need to accept their fish fate and not blame the dealer, the fraera or the crooked chair))mssmotilda said:
only those players who do not have enough money are dissatisfied etc or any mental illnessdreamer13 said:
but how you know that the player who is helped by RNG is not an employee or owner of the relevant poker site etcmr.fers_one said:
for the small poker room it would be a matter of survival etc I don't believe that 888pokers or pokerstars do that ,but you can't already know what they are doing on the other side of the screenoskarsbaumanis2 said:
Yes exactly. They make tons of fundamental mistakes and instead of recognizing their mistakes and working on their leaks, they try to find the error somewhere else.WrongUsername said:
orrrrrrr you're just wrong all along, and it is rigged but still winnable - just not as random as it supposed to be, whether intentionally or unintentionallySuns of Beaches said:
you probably haven't seen much of lifeSuns of Beaches said:
If you want to blame RNG for everything, then it would be impossible to play poker at all - or you want only you to win every gameZenonBR said:
Small poker rooms benefit from giving coolers to opponents in cash games, then the rake will be higher, with fewer hands. And you just haven't seen anything in poker yet to say anything for sure, and your brain is only enough to play freerolls and write nasty things.mr.fers_one said:
Do u have any concrete evidence of what u are saying regarding "small rooms"? What "small rooms" are we talking about?mssmotilda said:
I advise you to watch as many broadcasts as possible, this is the first, and the second is to start going offline and playing poker, then we'll talk about who is twisting what... and all these statements about small rooms and coolers for rake, these are all fantasies in favor of the weak... it is easier for people to find a reason than to admit that they are wrong))mssmotilda said:
Obviously because nobody runs great for very long. Means nothing.SpanRmonka said:
Yes I absolutely do believe that 1 person can't tell, they can be suspicious......and this is the crux of my argument......you can be suspicious, but its not possible to know this. The OP asked if you have had the impression that the RNG acts strangely in some tournaments. I'm saying anything who thinks they can detect a change in function of the RNG is completely and utterly delusional!!puzzlefish said:
So, if someone detects that they keep getting dealt aces, kings, queens, pocket pairs (and nothing else but those cards) over and over for the entirety of their session, they would be delusional to think something changed with the function of the RNG?SpanRmonka said:
You mean someone else has to get equally unlucky.SpanRmonka said: