But you had the idiots end of the str8. And tbh A2 is a POS IN EP. Are you expecting to flop the wheel with this hand? Just of pure instinct I would say you were way behind pre flop. Got ahead a bit on the flop but thinking critically you were never ahead. Moral of the story is... Fold that A2os in EP because against a fish this hand is almost always gonna get beat.Hi There
Do you think so?
Look what happened yday
I had A2 and some fish had 66
the flop: 345
I go allin and the fish calls
The turn: xx
The River 7
Now tell me....
Rgds
Well, keep us posted if and when such a book sees the light of day.
Somehow I doubt we will ever see it.wait, it comes to america too
Somehow I doubt we will ever see it.
An HUD would need to know what to measure in order to prove it is rigged or not. Right now all the normal measurements are passing, i e. frequencies of draws hitting over the long run, frequencies of cards, frequencies of someone being dealt AA, KK, etc., frequencies of winning with a particular hand over the long term, all of these are NORMAL.
If you stop looking at these measurements and program your HUD to look at who wins 2-3 hands after somebody else wins, then you can start figuring out how it is rigged. Many users of this forum already know this and apply this. Just a matter of time before it comes out in the wash.
I think we're in agreement in that currently HUDs are programmed for simple stat measurements rather than sequences of events. As for knowing the upcoming cards, nobody should know those unless the RNG is feeding into another program which then distributes the cards... right? This has been suggested several times over the many years that the rigged debate has been around. However, it doesn't seem to make sense that no employee so far has come forward to blow the whistle on this kind of setup.No it can't!
A HUD can only show you statistics, but not how the poker provider strategically takes you out of the tournament in tournaments.
Because YOU don't know the upcoming cards.
I have my doubts as it has been so many years without anyone coming forward and that now suddenly someone is allegedly going to do the whistleblowing.why so negative? instead of you being happy that someone from the scene finally says something about it! I do not understand. And why do you doubt that? Do you have reasons that make you doubt? 1/3 of the book is already finished.
If this is a true issue: why is this person writing a book about it? To make profit. The ethical thing to do would be to take it to the news outlets and government agencies. Once a book deal is involved I am switched off to the idea.
Will be nice a explanation.Please explain that to me.
You have humor SIR...ALL the best.....i really like your explenation.Rigged is like the earth being flat, if it was rigged or if the earth was flat it would be very easy to prove. HUDs would be able show that it was rigged and if the earth was flat cats would have already pushed everything over the edge.