Why I Prefer Playing One Table at a Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sahbi1403
  • Start date Start date
Absolutely correct. I also started with one table, and gradually, after a few years, I started playing at two, then three, and now I play mostly at three or four tables.
 
austral said:
The philosophy of a player who chooses to play one table would be something along the lines of: I don’t want to make more decisions; I want to make better decisions.
Click to expand...
I’ve tried both aproachat mand for me, one table simply leads to better decisions and better results.
I can stay pattient, observe my opoonents, and keep track of the information I collect from each hand.
When I play severizal tables, I feel that I miss importan detaills, so I prefer quality decisions over quantity.

Austral
 
dzsire said:
Playing at multiple tables isn't for everyone.
That said, you're right in that you focus on one table—after all, that's what you'd do in real life, when you are at a casino.
Click to expand...
I agree that playing multiple tables isn’t for eveeryone, and I’ve learned that from my own experience.
For me focusing on 1 table helps me stay patient, study my opponents, and make decisions without rushing
In a MMT I’d rather have fewar decisions but make them with full atention than play more hands and miss important information
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dzsire
marco198121 said:
It’s easy for me to manage the early and middle stages, but during the critical late stages—like yesterday, for instance—you tend to focus intensely on the specific situation you're in, such as the pre-bubble or a final table. That’s exactly what happened to me yesterday while playing two CardsChat tournaments simultaneously. I was at a tense final table in the WPT event, while the PartyPoker tournament hadn't reached that stage yet; however, without realizing it, I neglected some plays on PartyPoker because I was so focused on the WPT final table, and that caused me to lose positions on PartyPoker.
Click to expand...
I’ve had a similer experience when playing multiple tournaments at once specially when one reaches the critical stages
My attention naturally shift to the more important table and I can miss valuabl informztion or decisiuns on the other one
That’s why i prefer one table when i want to stay fully focused and make the best decisions posible
 
For those who don't need to play a high volume of games, it's a great option to stay fully focused by playing just one table at a time!
Although I do find playing a single table online a bit monotonous, unless it's an important tournament or the final table is ok
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Sahbi1403
LUKADONCICMVP said:
one table a time is a complete waste of time.
Click to expand...
I’ve tried playing multiples table, and I understand why some players prefer it, but it doesn’t work as well for me.
When I play one table, I can observe opponents closely, remember their tendencies, and take my time with every decision.
For my style it’s not about playing more hands, it’s about making better decisions with the information I have, thinks
 
I can play 3 tables comfortably. I have played more but for me, 3 is the optimum.
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Sahbi1403
thedarkman said:
I can play 3 tables comfortably. I have played more but for me, 3 is the optimum.
Click to expand...
I respect your choice. For me, playing just one table allows me to stay much more focused, gather more information, study my opponents, and make better decisions while reducing mistakes
 
Sintubai said:
For those who don't need to play a high volume of games, it's a great option to stay fully focused by playing just one table at a time!
Although I do find playing a single table online a bit monotonous, unless it's an important tournament or the final table is ok
Click to expand...
I feel the same way, 1 table may be less exciting, but it gives me more time to study my opponents and make better decisions
 
Rmi said:
That depends on each player and the practice they have.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, everyone has their own rhythm and comfort level depending on their experience
 
Poker Orifice said:
One or two tables is recommended if you're just getting started or still learning a new game... but if you've been playing for awhile you really should strive to add in more. One would think that one's intuitive process improves greatly and over time - - you will recognize certain spots frequently and will intuitively know how to deal with them. Many of today's regs. are playing upwards of a dozen tables at a time (some are even playing 20-24 tables earlier in their sessions). I'm referring to profiting regs. including some of the best.
Click to expand...
I understand your point, and I agree that experience makes multi-tabling easier. Personally, I still prefer one table because it allows me to focus deeply, study my opponents, and make better decisions.
 
Back
Top