I use PT4 because HUD's are the best and easiest way to do hand reviews and study past hands. Also help keep's track of how much I'm winning and losing. How else is one suppose to do hand reviews if not with a tracker? If you're not using tracker you're not studying. You don't study you're losing player.
I also personally play a lot by feel and my HUD I use very few stats showing live while playing. The few stats I use help greatly when double tabling full-ring as I find hard to remember 16-18 players at once.
I use VPIP, PFR, 3bet preflop, win % showdown and # of hands total.
Cheers!!!
I also personally play a lot by feel and my HUD I use very few stats showing live while playing. The few stats I use help greatly when double tabling full-ring as I find hard to remember 16-18 players at once.
I use VPIP, PFR, 3bet preflop, win % showdown and # of hands total.
Cheers!!!
I’m pro-HUD, but only as a tool, not a crutch. The “feel” comes from understanding frequencies, not guessing. A tracker doesn’t make you better by itself, it just keeps you honest. You still need to read dynamics and adapt faster than the stats.
Trackers make you better because data > “feel” almost every time. They show leaks you’d never notice, expose sizing patterns, and keep you honest about your own mistakes. The “feel” players talk about is usually just selective memory and ego. A strong instinct + solid tracker data is the real combo. Without stats, you’re guessing. With them, you’re adjusting.
I prefer to play pure. The majority of my play is live though so using a computer program to help me remember what hands others had wouldn’t help me at all in the long run.
Their is a debate about wether it is cheating also but now some sights like GG have stats built in which is probably to help recreational players with no memory recall.
The best option is whatever helps you and not what helps others. Some people have no idea how to even read a HUD.
Their is a debate about wether it is cheating also but now some sights like GG have stats built in which is probably to help recreational players with no memory recall.
The best option is whatever helps you and not what helps others. Some people have no idea how to even read a HUD.
I think these additional programmes are not superfluous, but I don't see any particular need for them either. Personally, I don't use any additional programmes, but if such statistical analysers and trackers are integrated into the poker application, I see no reason not to use them.
Any additional information you manage to get from your opponents will represent a higher support for your decision making. Knowing other players gaming profile is a huge advantage if you seriously intend to win. Pocker Tracker's stats should be native to every poker room with the smallest of care about providing the best interface to their players, which they don't.
On the contrary, most poker sites today look like websites from 1990.
At the current state of things, you have to "pay to win", which is just laughable, like everything else in "poker" online.
But if you intend to be a pro, you'll likely be better off hiring Pocker Tracker to improve your understanding about your opponents.
On the contrary, most poker sites today look like websites from 1990.
At the current state of things, you have to "pay to win", which is just laughable, like everything else in "poker" online.
But if you intend to be a pro, you'll likely be better off hiring Pocker Tracker to improve your understanding about your opponents.
Trackers are just tools. They’re great for studying and multitabling, but relying on them too much can lead to autopilot. “Feel” without data can be biased, and data without thinking is useless. Best results usually come from combining fundamentals, awareness, and selective use of stats.
I’m using PokerTracker 4 at the moment.
I used HM2 and HM3 a lot before because I think the HUD configuration is better,
but since I nowadays play most of my volume on partypoker, which doesn’t allow real time HUD,
I stick with PT4 mainly for study purposes.
I used HM2 and HM3 a lot before because I think the HUD configuration is better,
but since I nowadays play most of my volume on partypoker, which doesn’t allow real time HUD,
I stick with PT4 mainly for study purposes.
I have never used trackers and do not plan to do so. I play solely relying on skills, experience and my own analysis of the opponents' game. Trackers may be useful for those for whom the game is a professional activity, for me poker is just entertainment.
No HUDs' no trackers not anything . So trying to play against all other players who use them make it very difficult . And this is without adding the additional programms or software or bots they might be using at the same time . Sad to see this all these years also in the nano stakes . It's poker rooms fault 100%
no HUD here, if online wants to eliminate cheating they should ban anything and everything that could help you other then your brain,why should anyone get artificial help thought we were playing poker not computer games ,but Im old school people today cant do anything it seems without their smartphone, I find that frightening that people cant do anything like playing a game without outside help,must say I love playing in casino with players that play lots online with a HUD,find they really struggle in live situations without something to tell them what they should do ,so I live with the players online cheating in my humble opinion,and exploit that in live situations😀