BART777 said:in general, many have already written that a lot depends on the machine, so the comparison is simply incorrect and impossible. even in modern conditions, put everyone behind the same cars and Hamilton will not be a super champion, because he competes with only one rider, a teammate. (example of Rosberg 2016)
Rob Hobson said:Racers should have comparisons but measuring their deeds in their times, whit all technology, environment, and rules they were surrounded by etc. The great racers throughout F1 history were made by their bigger records and numbers and many of them had been forgotten, not by the enthusiasts, but by the average media, mainly overcome by the record numbers updated by the passing times. Who can forget Gilles Villenueve (father), the most fearless race driver of all times; Nigel Mansel, the lion; Niki Lauda, the plane pilot, who came back from an accident which burned his body an face and won the following championship; Fangio, the biggest champion; Ricardo Patrese, fearless flying Italian; Jacks Stuart, the flying Scottish; Jim Clark, another fearless and champ at 2 different categories; Emerson Fittipaldi, champion at both F1 and F Indy (won the most danger race Indianapolis 500 miles); Alain Prost, the professor, the most smooth driver and many many others if I put down here would be hard to read? They're all great and brought lots of fun and excitement at their times.
Now, Lewis Hamilton is the shinning guy of the moment.
But one thing is for sure, that there were further more excitements during the old times F1.
BART777 said:in general, many have already written that a lot depends on the machine, so the comparison is simply incorrect and impossible. even in modern conditions, put everyone behind the same cars and Hamilton will not be a super champion, because he competes with only one rider, a teammate. (example of Rosberg 2016)
oscarhuka said:
:driver:I fully agree with you my friend!
That's right.Viparida said:But that was the same for schumacher, ferrari in the 2000s was the maclaren of 2010s and he didn`t even had a competitor inside his team may i remember the time when ferrari ordered barrichello to drop his first position to schumacher that was in second. Senna was an amazing driver, but i do not like to pick who was the best because it is not truly comparable. The truth is that from the 2000s forward F1 lost some of it`s fun not only for the drop of accidents which made the race more predictable but also for sheer domination of some teams.
Nel1523 said:Senna and Schumacher far above Hamilton! I don't know if hamilton would earn that much without the car he has today