I believe that VAR make the game fairer and more honest, it eliminates judicial errors and does not take much time to stop during the match, it almost does not affect the course of the game. but the arbitrators can now sleep well
VAR is much needed in todays game, and has proved successful in some cases. The only downfall to it is the structure they have set up to use it.
In the World Cup they had a room with a panel of 3 referees all watching TV screens, but yet the official referee had the refer to an individual television at the side of the pitch in order to give a verdict. This definitely needs to change and the official referee needs to be mic'd up to the video referees and listen to their verdict. It works perfectly in the sport of Rugby League over here in the UK, so there is no reason as to why it can't work in football.
In the World Cup they had a room with a panel of 3 referees all watching TV screens, but yet the official referee had the refer to an individual television at the side of the pitch in order to give a verdict. This definitely needs to change and the official referee needs to be mic'd up to the video referees and listen to their verdict. It works perfectly in the sport of Rugby League over here in the UK, so there is no reason as to why it can't work in football.
At the moment, opinions on innovations are different, but most agree that the future of sports stands behind the VAR. Football is a game in which honesty and objectivity should stand above all, and the introduction of the system is repeated
After last game of Levante V Real Madrid everyone saw VAR it’s a JOKE I’m a Real Madrid Fan but that was not a penalty...😱😱
Definitely FIFA has a lot of work to to whit this system. Every weekend keep doing mistakes after mistake....
Definitely FIFA has a lot of work to to whit this system. Every weekend keep doing mistakes after mistake....
DieCosta said:
I will share my thoughts.About this "VAR thing".
VAR would be extremely useful for the game. If it is used properly.DieCosta said:
DieCosta said:
I do not want to say, that VAR is not working. VAR works. It needs fine tuning. For example:
Better view angle of offside situation ...and more...
DieCosta said:
I think it's worth it.
DieCosta said:
Already at the beginning, began with the abuse of VAR. In the specific football match. The Referee decided that it was not necessary to use "VAR's advice". Despite requests from the other team,to examine the situation through the VAR.
The VAR should serve to both teams. And not just for one team. And to actually defeat the other team. In this case, no VAR is needed. And only 4 or 6 referees brigade.
The team or the other team, should not be ignored. No matter what football club it is.
Otherwise it would be a disaster.
🙂
VAR is a great improvement to the football. I hope it gets even better cause right now a referee is not being assisted by VAR in case of a second yellow card for example. Also, I think it should be used in the cases when a goal is scored from a corner or a from a free kick that has been falsely given. For example, in the WC final, France scored their first goal after a foul on Griezman, which should not have been given in the first place. However, I am a big fan of VAR, eventhough there are still mistakes being made even with VAR. Like a penalty for RMCF the other day against Levante.
I hate cheating, corruption, or the stupid mistakes by human judges. So many sports are ruined by bad judges. I'd prefer if some omniscient being was the judge, but since that won't happen, at least the VAR is a step in the right direction. I love how the Hawk-Eye made tennis and volleyball a lot more fair.
Of course, in its infant stages of development it's bound to be imperfect. Its true form may end up very different than what we have at the moment. I don't see why you'd want to kill it in its alpha stage, except if you prefer the games to remain unfair. You could as well replace the players by artists and leave the human judge to decide the outcome alone. Is the sport supposed to be a real competition or a theatre?
Of course, in its infant stages of development it's bound to be imperfect. Its true form may end up very different than what we have at the moment. I don't see why you'd want to kill it in its alpha stage, except if you prefer the games to remain unfair. You could as well replace the players by artists and leave the human judge to decide the outcome alone. Is the sport supposed to be a real competition or a theatre?
bzvz222 said:
Well I would probably be against using VAR to reverse judgement call penalties (the NFL is considering this too). And I think that games will never be officiated perfectly according to both fan bases. But all that being said, I say use every tool available to strive to fairness. Think about the Hand of God goal or the England v Germany goal/no goal... those both were botched and have been talked about for generations!
The technology that they are using most of the time is incredible, but sometimes instead of helping the referee it just confuses him and this is the reason why many people hate it.In the World Cup it was a little disappointing to see that most of the time it didn’t work as expected, but in the the fault goes to the helping referees and the main one.
