micromachine
Legend
Silver Level
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Total posts
- 5,770
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #401
^^ yeah you make a good point...I did think about that and almost wrote 12x instead lol..12x-15x prob better than 10x
Yoshimiii said:Man I try to stiffle my emotions when playing poker but this hand made me just a littttle bit annoyed at him...
I had just stacked him for 150BB's in the hand before. He was a maniac.
PokerStars Hand #91045129371: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2012/12/20 16:13:59 WET [2012/12/20 11:13:59 ET]
Table 'Erminia IV' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: salavatulaev ($10.81 in chips)
Seat 2: Yoshimiii ($32.26 in chips)
Seat 3: start36 ($25.27 in chips)
Seat 4: EJJEALOAR ($18.75 in chips)
Seat 5: viziter56 ($10 in chips)
Seat 6: donkhat3r ($15.51 in chips)
salavatulaev: posts small blind $0.05
Yoshimiii: posts big blind $0.10
viziter56: posts small blind $0.05
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Yoshimiii [Ah Kc]
start36: folds
EJJEALOAR: raises $0.20 to $0.30
viziter56: raises $0.20 to $0.50
donkhat3r: folds
salavatulaev: folds
Yoshimiii: raises $1 to $1.50
EJJEALOAR: folds
viziter56: raises $8.45 to $9.95 and is all-in
Yoshimiii: calls $8.45
*** FLOP *** [9s Jd 6d]
*** TURN *** [9s Jd 6d] 3♣
*** RIVER *** [9s Jd 6d 3c] 7♥
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Yoshimiii: shows [Ah Kc] (high card Ace)
viziter56: shows [2c 2s] (a pair of Deuces)
viziter56 collected $19.39 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $20.30 | Rake $0.91
Board [9s Jd 6d 3c 7h]
Seat 1: salavatulaev (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: Yoshimiii (big blind) showed [Ah Kc] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 3: start36 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: EJJEALOAR folded before Flop
Seat 5: viziter56 showed [2c 2s] and won ($19.39) with a pair of Deuces
Seat 6: donkhat3r (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
duggs said:4 combos that beat you, 6 we chop with, given he is an unknown you could either do the cash equiv of scoping him. or just give him a wider range. AQss AJss KQs are possible and thats 4 combos. KQo/KJo reduced combos if he is spewy. QQ JJ both possible but unlikely to bet turn. I would rather call/call than allow him to bet fold Ax blockers against us. If we know he is a nitball we can just r/f pre but given unknown i call turn call river, and if he checks river i jam.
Its just too often he turns out to be a button masher given no history
Yoshimiii said:I wouldn't have thought it would work like you say, as there is more chance of one person going all in post flop if there are more people in the multi-way pot, however I wouldn't have thought by adding both stacks together you can count it as one stack because if one villain goes all in, it is much less likely that the other villain will go all in as well as he needs a much stronger hand to call. So I wouldn't half the stacks to 10x to call but I would decrease it slightly to 15x times to need to make the call... Hope I made sense. This is how I view it atleast anyway, might be wrong with my logic.
Edit: also I think it would be better to have one person with a full stack 100BB's, rather than two people with 50BB's as if both people go all in you have more chance of getting sucked out on. I know you do lose less if you get sucked out on but compared to the 100BB's you still win the same amount but have less chance of getting sucked out on or coolered.
micromachine said:^^ yeah you make a good point...I did think about that and almost wrote 12x instead lol..12x-15x prob better than 10x
pocketehs said:I guess if you have history with him then I probably wouldve been fine GII pre here for 100bbs. I know at 2-5nl a general amount of people are only shipping like QQ+/AK for 100bbs and in those situations were dominated pretty well. Some looser players I can also include JJ/AQ.
Was wondering what range you put the villain on here? I think his 5-bet jam looks pretty strong. Tough one man
bump because ended betwen other hand/Logan/ said:10nl. We have QQ on LP villain on MP raise 4x, we 3b 3x and villain insta 4b 3x, not many hands (less than 50) villain is a fish 42/26 3B:10, not enough hands for 4b, but on previews 3B he face (not by me) he just flat. still ship it?.
/Logan/ said:10nl. We have QQ on LP villain on MP raise 4x, we 3b 3x and villain insta 4b 3x, not many hands (less than 50) villain is a fish 42/26 3B:10, not enough hands for 4b, but on previews 3B he face (not by me) he just flat. still ship it?.
pocketehs said:I guess if you have history with him then I probably wouldve been fine GII pre here for 100bbs. I know at 2-5nl a general amount of people are only shipping like QQ+/AK for 100bbs and in those situations were dominated pretty well. Some looser players I can also include JJ/AQ.
Was wondering what range you put the villain on here? I think his 5-bet jam looks pretty strong. Tough one man
pocketehs said:Thanks for the help guys. So we would combine the two stack sizes for our ESS to compare our 15 x money to call?
Yoshimiii said:I don't know what "ESS" means but... when I am against two opponents I generally want them to have 20x the stack of their bet to call (this lowers if I am IP), this is because when calling to setmine I usually go by the 25x-30x rule. So I generally lower it to 20x with two opponents in the pot, there are exceptions, like if one guy has 23x bet and other has 16x I would probably call. Also if I think a nit is raising extremely tight I will try to set mine so I can stack him of... But I used to call so often trying to hit sets that I found it was a major leak and cut back immensely on it. Also Dan Harrington suggested the 25x Stack of bet to call trying to hit a set as so often you will just have to fold.
Edit: ovbiously with these strict rules I set myself I rarely have a good opportunity and even when I do I usually miss the sets.
Hope I answered your question, kind of got off track abit, reply if I am not making any sense.
pocketehs said:Someone tell me how bad I played this..
Villain: 23/6/1 over 47 hands.
I didnt 3-bet pre because I didnt think JJ was strong enough if villain came over the top with a 4-bet then I would have been put in a tough spot. I think with that logic though I just try to check call all the way to the river, right? the c/r on the flop is bad then right?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (6 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com
Villain (Button) ($3.29)
SB ($1.95)
Hero (BB) ($5)
UTG ($6)
MP ($5.75)
CO ($6.25)
Preflop: Hero is BB with J, J![]()
![]()
UTG calls $0.05, 2 folds, Villain bets $0.20, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.15, UTG calls $0.15
Flop: ($0.62) 5, 4
, 6
(3 players)![]()
Hero checks, UTG checks, Villain bets $0.40, Hero raises to $1, 1 fold, Villain raises to $3.09 (All-In), Hero calls $2.09
RWPKRPLR said:If you 3bet this you can further define his hand, no one at this level will be 4betting light so if he come over the top easy decisions are to come. Also 3 betting him wil prob isolate him and being a fish over 47 hands it should be easy to determine what his range is based on his action on the flop.
pocketehs said:Someone tell me how bad I played this..
Villain: 23/6/1 over 47 hands.
I didnt 3-bet pre because I didnt think JJ was strong enough if villain came over the top with a 4-bet then I would have been put in a tough spot. I think with that logic though I just try to check call all the way to the river, right? the c/r on the flop is bad then right?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (6 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com
Villain (Button) ($3.29)
SB ($1.95)
Hero (BB) ($5)
UTG ($6)
MP ($5.75)
CO ($6.25)
Preflop: Hero is BB with J, J![]()
![]()
UTG calls $0.05, 2 folds, Villain bets $0.20, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.15, UTG calls $0.15
Flop: ($0.62) 5, 4
, 6
(3 players)![]()
Hero checks, UTG checks, Villain bets $0.40, Hero raises to $1, 1 fold, Villain raises to $3.09 (All-In), Hero calls $2.09
JOEBOB69 said:That was a 4bet pre all day long Alfie
Yoshimiii said:I agree that a 3 bet with the J/J pre-flop usually will be a good saying of where you stand. His stats are not very fishy however, just more Loose/Passive so I from the line you took I think it's not good at all. Check calling would be the best, evaluating each street based on the card and his bet sizing. I only ever check-raise bluffs (hardly ever do at these stakes) or sets when the villain is a fish who cbets lots and will call a big check-raise.
Overall I do hate the check-raise but once you do check-raise you have to call the shove I think.
/Logan/ said:Even when his PFR is 6, he is on BTN so his range could be wider and just stealing, so 3B here should help to take the hand right there, to give some info or to at least isolate and go HU vs him.
As played the plan to just check-call was fine i guess, hate the Ch-R too like yoshii but still i fold because we beat only 88-99-1010 but lose to 44-55-66-QQ-KK-AA. I don´t think a passive player like this go wild there with AK/AQ unless he have the FD, but still on those cases he probably just call to see if hit.
edit...
47 hands are not many but should be enough to give us a rough idea how he is playing from BTN if we see his R1 or STL stat by position.