****Juggernaut June Poker Chat Thread******

[c9h13no3]

I thought this hand was cool:

Ultimate Bet, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker

BTN: $188.10 (188.1 bb)
SB: $343 (343 bb)
BB: $89.60 (89.6 bb)
UTG: $44.70 (44.7 bb)
MP: $82.75 (82.8 bb)
Hero (CO): $203.25 (203.3 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is CO with 9♥ 6♥
UTG folds, MP calls $1, Hero raises to $6, BTN folds, SB raises to $19.50, 2 folds, Hero calls $13.50

Flop: ($41) 8♣ 9♠ 10♠ (2 players)
SB bets $33, Hero calls $33

Turn: ($107) Q♥ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

River: ($107) 6♦ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $150.50, SB calls $150.50

Results: $408 pot ($2 rake)
Hero showed 9♥ 6♥ (two pairs, Nines and Sixes) and won $406 ($203 net)
SB showed A♠ A♦ (a pair of Aces) and lost (-$203 net)

 

[WVHillbilly]

What was your plan on blank river?

 

[bob_tiger]

i wasnt sure if it theres 3 streets of value you here and he can bluff his missed flush draws as well

ok so I thought about the hand in depth a lil, kind of sleepy so my brain isnt working 100% lol, anyways this is never a set imo or he should be raising the turn if he knows anything about poker. Kind of sucks you don't have any stats on him, I also don't think its KT. So really all I'm putting him on is a really weak ass King with Q that sucked out but even then I have hard time putting him on that, like he would prolly raise you with KQ on the turn, but like the way I see it is possibly K9 and just bunch of draws so I guess check is fine the way you played it but definitely bet more on the turn here and your decision is much easier. At first I thought you should be betting the river but now I'm going with your check call. I think you should probably post in hand analysis but I'm sure you will get 20 people still saying bet the turn more lol

 

[c9h13no3]

What was your plan on blank river?

Check, because I can't beat an over-pair, but I can beat AK.

 

[dsvw56]

eagerly awaiting something awesome . . .

 

[Tygran]

anybody seen the hangover?

 

[bob_tiger]

eagerly awaiting something awesome . . .

another 10-15 minutes imo lol.

 

[bob_tiger]

anybody seen the hangover?

i think i might of

 

[dsvw56]

anybody seen the hangover?

Yeah, it was pretty good.

 

[Monoxide]

Shouldnt have called him oop with this shitty little ****ing small pair again, i cant win a 60/40... damn his straight draw should have been a 70/30. ehhhh w/e...

--------------------
HAND #1
--------------------
Full Tilt, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 7 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
MP1: $237 (118.5 bb)
MP2: $210.30 (105.2 bb)
MP3: $200 (100 bb)
CO: $223.20 (111.6 bb)
BTN: $346.90 (173.5 bb)
Hero (SB): $200 (100 bb)
BB: $272 (136 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is SB with 5:spade: 5:club:
3 folds, CO raises to $8, BTN folds, Hero calls $7, BB folds
Flop: ($18) 7:club: 5:diamond: 3:diamond: (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $14, Hero raises to $40, CO raises to $215.20 and is all-in, Hero calls $152 and is all-in
Turn: ($402) 2:heart: (2 players, 2 are all-in)
River: ($402) K:heart: (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Results:[spoil] $402 pot ($3 rake)
CO showed A:diamond: 4:diamond: (a straight, Ace to Five) and won $399 ($199 net)
Hero showed 5:spade: 5:club: (three of a kind, Fives) and lost (-$200 net)
[/spoil]

 

[c9h13no3]

Yeah, it was pretty good.

The message I had entered was too short.

 

[SeanyJ]

I'm very disappointed in the lack of something awesome being posted.

 

[dsvw56]

I'm very disappointed in the lack of something awesome being posted.

This^^^^

 

[zachvac]

Don't worry the awesome stuff will be posted.

 

[dsvw56]

Last hand before rebuy period ended. Weeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!! 3rd in chips now.

Poker Stars, $3.30 Buy-in (100/200 blinds) NL Hold'em Tourney, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker

UTG: 4,900 (24.5 bb)
MP: 5,775 (28.9 bb)
CO: 9,630 (48.2 bb)
Hero (BTN): 5,900 (29.5 bb)
SB: 1,225 (6.1 bb)
BB: 4,540 (22.7 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is BTN with A

K

UTG raises to 4,900 and is all-in, 2 folds, Hero raises to 5,900 and is all-in, SB folds, BB calls 4,340 and is all-in

Flop: (14,440) 3

5

4

(3 players, 3 are all-in)
Turn: (14,440) 8

(3 players, 3 are all-in)
River: (14,440) 6

(3 players, 3 are all-in)

Results: 14,440 pot
UTG showed T

9

(high card Ten) and lost (-4,900 net)
Hero showed A

K

(high card Ace) and won 14,440 (9,540 net)
BB showed A

Q

(high card Ace) and lost (-4,540 net)

 

[eNTy]

lol hi card ftw dsvw
oh and no something awesome ?

 

[ace2daface]

something awesome?

 

[eNTy]

Can someone explain why SPR only works on the flop ?
I mean I get that we calculate it by dividing smallest stack by the total preflop pot. But why doesnt it work on turn if we take the flop pot instead of preflop pot ?

 

[switch0723]

I thought this hand was cool:

Ultimate Bet, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker

BTN: $188.10 (188.1 bb)
SB: $343 (343 bb)
BB: $89.60 (89.6 bb)
UTG: $44.70 (44.7 bb)
MP: $82.75 (82.8 bb)
Hero (CO): $203.25 (203.3 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is CO with 9♥ 6♥
UTG folds, MP calls $1, Hero raises to $6, BTN folds, SB raises to $19.50, 2 folds, Hero calls $13.50

Flop: ($41) 8♣ 9♠ 10♠ (2 players)
SB bets $33, Hero calls $33

Turn: ($107) Q♥ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

River: ($107) 6♦ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $150.50, SB calls $150.50

Results: $408 pot ($2 rake)
Hero showed 9♥ 6♥ (two pairs, Nines and Sixes) and won $406 ($203 net)
SB showed A♠ A♦ (a pair of Aces) and lost (-$203 net)

due to the lack of something awsome from zach, i will just quote this hand from c9 again because it truly is a sick awesome river shove

 

[eNTy]

due to the lack of something awsome from zach, i will just quote this hand from c9 again because it truly is a sick awesome river shove

+1,
and not just because zach has let us down in a big way.
There better be more Umbrella hat related news.

Now plz answer my question above

 

[tenbob]

Guys ive been asked to mediate in a dispute from a local cash game last night, dunno why, i wasnt there but meh, I know most the the players.

Cash game, players busts, has no money, get a loan of €200 from another players stack, (supposed to be a table stakes game, ie the loan should have come from his pocket not his stack). Very next hand player that gave the loan gets stacked, and the other dude wants the extra €200 that he had give as a loan, as it should have been in his stack. Supposedly the stacks were deep. He argued that he had stepped away from the table as the loan happened, no one disputed that.

I rekon that if the loan wasnt questioned as it was happening then it stands, and he does not have to repay the €200 to another player. But meh, shitty situation I know them all well.

 

[WVHillbilly]

Yeah, the loan should have never happened from the guys chips but that said winner of the hand is NOT entitled to an extra $200. It's not like the chips were still in the lender's stack which the winner could clearly see during the hand.

Who's to say the lender would have played for stacks with an extra $200 in front of him anyway? No way the winner gets the extra $$.

 

[eNTy]

Pretty shitty indeed, would've been a lot simpler if the winner of the pot was there when the loan happened. If he didn't say anything, the 200 stays out of the pot and in the loan, if he did it would've been part of the losers stack in the first place.

No clue how you're gonna solve this one
Probably the winner is just gonna have to suck it up and leave the 200 as a loan to the first player.

 

[jewboy07]

ok so I thought about the hand in depth a lil, kind of sleepy so my brain isnt working 100% lol, anyways this is never a set imo or he should be raising the turn if he knows anything about poker. Kind of sucks you don't have any stats on him, I also don't think its KT. So really all I'm putting him on is a really weak ass King with Q that sucked out but even then I have hard time putting him on that, like he would prolly raise you with KQ on the turn, but like the way I see it is possibly K9 and just bunch of draws so I guess check is fine the way you played it but definitely bet more on the turn here and your decision is much easier. At first I thought you should be betting the river but now I'm going with your check call. I think you should probably post in hand analysis but I'm sure you will get 20 people still saying bet the turn more lol

yeah he ended up having KQ, also a reason i didnt bet river is because if he did have that or some odd made getting raised would suck

 

[zachvac]

lol the awesome thing is really annoying I'll try to get it posted today.

And tenbob he doesn't owe the money and it's not even close. If he had lost his stack he wouldn't have given him an extra 200. Obviously he shouldn't have been allowed to loan $200 on the table but once he does it's gone. The hand could have played out totally different with the extra $200 in front, he doesn't automatically get the money.