LD1977 said:hackmeplz - I understand what you are saying but by that logic we should just cbet 100% if we get more than 33.3% folds. The problem here is our cbet flop %, namely what hands are we NOT cbetting there? Our entire EP opening range can be argued to have some overcard/backdoor equity.
High cbet% will get attacked eventually with raises and floats (also, do we XF every time we check? I would like to have a XC/XR range). Also if we XF turn every time we miss our 8% (or even 10%) chance, we do that too much and suddenly our medium hands get attacked every time we try to pot control and we have to guess a lot... so then to counter we have to double/triple weak hands a lot. I just think all this taken together is hardly going to be profitable or at least better than having a more balanced (= smaller) flop cbet% which allows for XC/XR balance. Not cbetting OOP in MW pots on this kind of flop helps our overall stats.
The fact we have 4 nut outs helps, while overcard outs are tricky because they give us weak TP (RIO). Backdoor outs are nice but sometimes we will get burned by better BD draws.
Edit: Few comments. On all boards and vs. any number of opponents turn cbet gets less folds, so it is not profitable by itself (it needs a river barrel, which again has higher fold equity). 100NL+ might not be applicable for 10NL, I think 5NL-10NL play almost the same so those 2 could be taken together to increase sample size (I do it by taking stats of other players).
LD1977 said:hackmeplz - I understand what you are saying but by that logic we should just cbet 100% if we get more than 33.3% folds.
DunningKruger said:I maybe should've checked back in here sooner but I didn't think that whole cbet conversation was going to keep going on this way. We all seem to agree that it's a profitable play in a vacuum. Since there was literally nothing in the way of info/reads/stats and all that fun stuff provided with the hand in question there's no reason why you wouldn't make the play here. In case they eventually decide down the road that you're cbetting too much? See if they even realize first. If they do, let's see them try to adjust properly. We can shift gears at any time so we needn't leave money on the table by trying to adjust in advance to something that hasn't happened yet and may not at all. Our range is so much stronger than theirs on boards like this. We need to take advantage of it.
As for why aren't we cbetting our entire range here, well it's a great question lol. It can be argued that we should be. I wouldn't do it literally you can drop a few combos of unimproved small pairs or whatever... it really depends on OP's exact UTG range and whether it includes any offsuit unpaired hole cards etc but all of that aside let's keep in mind it's 10NL. If they have a HUD at all they're probably not going much deeper than your overall cbet figure which should look perfectly normal in spite of firing in this particular situation a whole lot (since we'll have many other opportunities to cbet that aren't this good). If one of your opponents eventually says "gee whiz this guy has cbet me 15 of the last 17 times on broken 9 high boards from UTG" then well knowing is half the battle (thank you Gung-Ho for teaching me that one) but he's still got to do something about it. Maybe he'll let you go all 3 streets with AA/KK. Maybe he'll find the balls to bluff raise said flops repping sets and complete air. Maybe he'll actually wait for those aforementioned sets before ever playing back at you heh. We have a plan for whatever it may be, but in the meantime exploitative playing tactics would be the way to go at 10NL.
Too bad I didn't really get to say anything until after the convo died. Oh well.
DunningKruger said:I maybe should've checked back in here sooner but I didn't think that whole cbet conversation was going to keep going on this way. We all seem to agree that it's a profitable play in a vacuum. Since there was literally nothing in the way of info/reads/stats and all that fun stuff provided with the hand in question there's no reason why you wouldn't make the play here. In case they eventually decide down the road that you're cbetting too much? See if they even realize first. If they do, let's see them try to adjust properly. We can shift gears at any time so we needn't leave money on the table by trying to adjust in advance to something that hasn't happened yet and may not at all. Our range is so much stronger than theirs on boards like this. We need to take advantage of it.
As for why aren't we cbetting our entire range here, well it's a great question lol. It can be argued that we should be. I wouldn't do it literally you can drop a few combos of unimproved small pairs or whatever... it really depends on OP's exact UTG range and whether it includes any offsuit unpaired hole cards etc but all of that aside let's keep in mind it's 10NL. If they have a HUD at all they're probably not going much deeper than your overall cbet figure which should look perfectly normal in spite of firing in this particular situation a whole lot (since we'll have many other opportunities to cbet that aren't this good). If one of your opponents eventually says "gee whiz this guy has cbet me 15 of the last 17 times on broken 9 high boards from UTG" then well knowing is half the battle (thank you Gung-Ho for teaching me that one) but he's still got to do something about it. Maybe he'll let you go all 3 streets with AA/KK. Maybe he'll find the balls to bluff raise said flops repping sets and complete air. Maybe he'll actually wait for those aforementioned sets before ever playing back at you heh. We have a plan for whatever it may be, but in the meantime exploitative playing tactics would be the way to go at 10NL.
Too bad I didn't really get to say anything until after the convo died. Oh well.
micromachine said:Fold pre, seriously you are not getting a 'good price' there, your cards are garbage, if BTN overcalls you aren't IP, and if someone 3bets/squeezes you're going to be in trouble.
Post is fine OTF and fine OTT, river depends on how nitty he is (do you know that?), and whether he'll open with AJ/KJ/QJ/99/88 from UTG. Assuming he's a total unknown I think AJ/99/88/44/AA/KK/QQ is his range for calling a river raise, you beat 18 combos and lose to 13 combos, even if you include KJ (unlikely open from UTG) you still beat more than you lose to so I think raise, but not too big otherwise QQ-AA may fold, CIB maybe?




BenjiHustle said:Welcome back.
Your last post is almost identical to your post before it. Lol
LD1977 said:I thought you have a huge BR these days after binking those tourneys? 😕
Anyway, no idea how to sync stuff, I do things manually.
Meaning, you can either export one DB and import it into the other or copy hand histories from one computer and import those into the other.