Looks like William Hill will be switching networks from crypro to i-poker sometime in the next few weeks. Looks good as a skin to whore for a bit, Will Hill has always had some nice looking RB deals, withir or not it will continue on the new network has yet to be seen.
tenbob said:
It is the software that gets me. I tried titan a while ago playing 6max and i just couldn't make the software work - i would constantly time out and auto fold and my hands/hr was so bad compared to stars that even if the players were worse it really didn't matter. But software matters alot less in HU since you play less tables. $1 rake just makes no sense, clearly must reduce the HU traffic by alot.
The fact that there is no time bank is really really annoying. I find that I cannot handle anymore than 6 tables, the turbo ones only give you 10 seconds to act or you get folded if your facing one of these annoying river min-bets that you never fold to anyway.
tenbob said:
Yea was same with me. Like 4-6 tables was max and they don't even pop up properly when cascaded (neither does party, was the reason i moved back to HU). No time banks would be managable if they didn't give you less time to act in general than any site i've seen.
Wonder how ongame is, anybody play there?
I think you only need 600? Clears in a few thousand hands @ nl200. Only took me a little over a month to clear the 4000 points for the $500 deposit bonus. The problem is that there will be a 6k point stretch before i reach the 12000 points for the $1000 bonus or whatever it is where i don't get anything. The $1000 bonus clears at like 40% rakeback tho i think, so i'll probably start using these reload bonuses to help bridge the gap to get to the 12k points.
In any case while the vip of party sucks, it actually gives an advantage to HU players (just count the generation of points as raked hands of a certain stake,even tho with 50c rake you pay less rake per raked hand in HU) whereas @ stars it would be like 3% rakeback. Party is probably 20% all up i'd guess @ nl200 HU and very marginally better at nl400, although i've heard you can get like 40% with rakeback deals (which aren't allowed from what i understand) but i never know the right ppl...
In any case while the vip of party sucks, it actually gives an advantage to HU players (just count the generation of points as raked hands of a certain stake,even tho with 50c rake you pay less rake per raked hand in HU) whereas @ stars it would be like 3% rakeback. Party is probably 20% all up i'd guess @ nl200 HU and very marginally better at nl400, although i've heard you can get like 40% with rakeback deals (which aren't allowed from what i understand) but i never know the right ppl...
Last edited:
feitr said:
Sorry Feitr for the delay, Been busy at work.
Ok, I've only played 100nl and for the most part it's seems pretty easy. Even the regs are terrabad. I've only struggled against probably 1-2 regs. The short stackers are even beatable 🙂. There's usually at least 10 tables running, with probably 3-4 regs waiting for more action.
just looking now, 1900 GMT:
100nl - 20 tables running /6 tables 1 player sat down
200nl - 7 tables running / 21 tables 1 player sat down 😱
400nl - 10 tables running /20 tables 1 player sat down
600nl - 5 tables running / 14 tables 1 player sat down
1000nl - 1 table running / 8 tables 1 player sat down
The same regs will be registered for 200nl games upto 1knl!
Feitr - BTW, if you go through an affiliate, and tell them you play 50k hands/month of 100-200nl min, then they usually get you promoted to the top level VIP. I'm led to believe that this equates to something like 33% RB at 6max, and +40% at FR. Not sure what it equates to at HU as I'm in the process of evaluating that this month.