Which game do you prefer? Hold'em, Omaha...give your opinion.

  • Thread starter Thread starter AvaPoker13
  • Start date Start date
AvaPoker13

AvaPoker13

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
Hold'em is a much simpler game, what does anyone gain from weak hands, since Ohama is a little more complicated, will hardly gain only pair or two pair. For those who understand the game, it's a great opportunity to make money and get away a bit of the crazy betting everything all the time. Not to mention that major tournaments Omaha, paid sometimes even more than texas hold'em. How about to risk?
 
Hold'em because it is much easier to play your opponents. Omaha can lead to pretty crazy bets also because it allows for more draws which leads to more suckouts so in the end I would prefer more money and less tilting with Hold'em
 
For me NLH,i played omaha hi in the past for a while,not for me,to much gamble ,lol
 
Holdem, becouse this one style poker more balanced than others
Omaha 4cards, always playing for flush or straight, and in holdem you usuaally play for One High pair or two pairs 😀
 
No Limit Holdem, because it is the most dominant game of poker, requires more discipline than Omaha and is more simple and fun for me.
 
Nl holdem, sure. In holdem its a lot of depends on skill and reading abilities.
 
Plays more Holdem as it is more available but I most like Horse.
 
When I first started playing poker 13 years ago, I played omaha at 25pl. I made some money, but later on I started losing so started playing holdem at the same level and lost a lot too. These days I play very little omaha but when I do, I lose. Holdem is my game now full time, and because if the things I have learned from the players here, I'm starting to be a winning player.
 
too much variance on Omaha so it usually has spam effect on me...But i play Omaha when i want to stay awake 😛
 
No Limit Texas Hold'Em. Hold'em is the most played and recognisable form of poker in the world. The fact you're only allowed two cards gives us the ability to be deceitful about our holding, but at the same time we have the ability to put our opponents on a specific hand. On the other hand, Omaha is played with four cards which can make it more difficult than with Hold'em to put players on a range- yet alone a single hand. Omaha can be quite fun in the sense that you often get to see straights beaten by flushes and full houses beaten by quads, but nothing compares to the big equity flips that Hold'em presents us.
 
texas hold'em is dinamic and the bluuf is more applied

I like texas hold'em find most dynamic and popular , I think that bluffing is a crucial element in poker is more exciting applied in hold'em
 
omaha..a lot more action with omaha and you get a lot of people that don't have a clue
 
I started to play Omaha freerolls and I´m enjoying it. I hope I can get some Money from it. You have to think more than in holdem.
 
NL Holdem of course. I can play this game while I'm watching tv or surfing on the net. Omaha needs much more attention. 🙂
 
I've always preferred Hold'Em, but have played some smaller Omaha games recently due to very soft play there. (My own play in Omaha isn't great, but I've found a lot of players on WPN that just don't know what is going on, lol)
 
I like them both. But I think I like Holdem a bit more. I don't know why..
 
NL Holdem, it's more dynamic and interesting for me (maybe because I'm not so good in Omaha yet lol).
 
my game that I like is primarily the 5-card draw Badugi second place and thirdly the draw 2-7 nl , holm limitless , play in tournaments because there are not many choices of named before games, but I try not to lose the opportunity to play them when I have at my disposal
 
Back
Top