F Paulsson said:It actually started with quite an upswing. I'm break-even for the month.
Well then. Here I was feeling sorry for you (not really I know you can handle it).
F Paulsson said:It actually started with quite an upswing. I'm break-even for the month.
Tygran said:his main point is that stars is waaay nittier than FT (at $100 NL anyway) since the best Stars tables are surprisingly comparable to any random FT table.
*obviously an unscientific study but seems to be a generally accepted conclusion
eNTy said:I've noticed this too. Even at 25nl, possibly more regs and less donks than at Stars and lower table VPIPs.
Oh I misunderstood your point. Anyways at 25nl I feel tilt is nittier than stars..
And lolololol
[ ] villain knows when he's pot committed
CO: $15.27 (61.1 bb)
BTN: $36.54 (146.2 bb)
SB: $25 (100 bb)
BB: $65.08 (260.3 bb)
UTG+2: $23.70 (94.8 bb)
Hero (MP1): $30.22 (120.9 bb)
MP2: $25 (100 bb)
MP3: $48.56 (194.2 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is MP1 with T♦ T♠
UTG+2 raises to $1.20, Hero calls $1.20, 6 folds
Flop: ($2.75) T♥ Q♣ K♣ (2 players)
UTG+2 bets $2.50, Hero raises to $7, UTG+2 calls $4.50
Turn: ($16.75) T♣ (2 players)
UTG+2 checks, Hero bets $9, UTG+2 calls $9
River: ($34.75) 4♠ (2 players)
UTG+2 checks, Hero bets $7, UTG+2 folds
Results: $34.75 pot ($1.73 rake)
Hero mucked T♦ T♠ (four of a kind, Tens) and won $33.02 ($15.82 net)
WVHillbilly said:Ok, but wouldn't comparing Stars best to FTs best make the point more clearly?
kleitches said:Probably, but the monkey was just wanting to do a little experimenting, not a thesis. 😛
WVHillbilly said:Damn dirty apes!
kleitches said:Holy shit, Enty! You mean you chose not to slowplay your set and check all three streets this time? 😉 <3 you.
Irexes said:FP please don't run bad. This directly contradicts one of the tenets of my new religion The Church of the Latterday Multipliers.
I'd appreciate not having to schism myself at this time.
Thanks.
F Paulsson said:I'll get back to you at the end of a month when I've turned this ship around and score a five-figure net win.
switch0723 said:Me and my mate finally won a game of 2v2 on the court near us. All be it we were against 2 14 year olds, but a win is a win and that now takes our record to 1 win 7 losses. If we can do that, then i can beat 100nl dammit
dsvw56 said:how in the hell are fish so good at cold-calling 3-bets with super marginal hands and flopping the nuts?
Richyl2008 said:I will let you know when i find out:
--------------------
HAND #1
--------------------
Party Poker, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
MP: $50 (100 bb)
CO: $50 (100 bb)
BTN: $25 (50 bb)
SB: $60.80 (121.6 bb)
Hero (BB): $71.15 (142.3 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is BB with A♦ A♥
MP folds, CO raises to $2, BTN folds, SB calls $1.75, Hero raises to $8, CO folds, SB calls $6
Flop: ($18) 6♣ 4♥ 7♠ (2 players)
SB bets $52.80 and is all-in, Hero calls $52.80
Turn: ($123.60) 5♣ (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: ($123.60) 2♠ (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Results:[spoil] $123.60 pot ($2 rake)
SB showed 7♥ 6♥ (two pairs, Sevens and Sixes) and won $121.60 ($60.80 net)
Hero mucked A♦ A♥ (a pair of Aces) and lost (-$60.80 net)
[/spoil]
sindri_93 said:Your doing it wrong?😛
sigh....well played sirdsvw56 said:You're doing it wrong. He was the original raiser, so it obviously doesn't count.
well no it was a SNG i just said tourneyeNTy said:You're playing tournies ? That's your problem right there.
dsvw56 said:how in the hell are fish so good at cold-calling 3-bets with super marginal hands and flopping the nuts?
dsvw56 said:You're doing it wrong. He was the original raiser, so it obviously doesn't count.