There has been a lot of news around bots and cheating in online poker again. Does this make you question the integrity of the sites you that you choose to play? What can poker sites do to make you feel secure in playing there?
Cameras to record the actual person playing? That seems like a big invasion of privacy that most people would not want to agree to.rhoudini said:The first thing that comes to my mind is start demanding the use of cameras to record each player. However, the more I consider this idea, the more I see that it still does not guarantee security. Maybe the rooms could include those "I am not a robot" verifications from time to time, where we are forced to choose which pictures have some object or type some numbers in a strange image, I don't know. Again, it seems that could not avoid cheating entirely, but maybe could help to identify when people might be cheating.
It certainly would not work for micro or low stakes, and maybe not necessary for tournaments at any stakes. But for the high stakes cash community (basically the most affected individually), I don't think it would be a problem (of course, by playing in tables with such feature they would be agreeing to expose their image as well as being exposed to others, playing under their real name). Basically, it would be a "live" cash game, like a brick-and-mortar casino. Charlie Carell was one big name that I've heard proposing this idea.Tammy said:Cameras to record the actual person playing? That seems like a big invasion of privacy that most people would not want to agree to.
That would be interesting to see for high stakes games. They might even be able to open a new revenue stream and charge people to watch!rhoudini said:It certainly would not work for micro or low stakes, and maybe not necessary for tournaments at any stakes. But for the high stakes cash community (basically the most affected individually), I don't think it would be a problem (of course, by playing in tables with such feature they would be agreeing to expose their image as well as being exposed to others, playing under their real name). Basically, it would be a "live" cash game, like a brick-and-mortar casino. Charlie Carell was one big name that I've heard proposing this idea.
I don't think there's much to hide when playing poker: people who grind seriously usually will be playing alone in a room to avoid distractions. Unless they have someone besides them giving tips, maybe (actually one video showed a room with so many people working together as a team playing a lot of tables, and in many of them there were two people, a player and his "coach" giving live tips when they were playing. People usually will be there, sitting as in a live game. Of course, a discussion about physical tells would rise again, but this idea has a price to be paid for some if it really could avoid cheating.
But in fact, I don't really know if this is enough to avoid bots. People are probably too smart to bypass and fake webcams today. You could even run a bot while there faking to play, maybe.
Sorry this is big off topic.Tammy said:Cameras to record the actual person playing? That seems like a big invasion of privacy that most people would not want to agree to.
I try to play less on sites where there are a lot of bots and where the random number generator is not accurate.CRStals said:There has been a lot of news around bots and cheating in online poker again. Does this make you question the integrity of the sites you that you choose to play? What can poker sites do to make you feel secure in playing there?
![]()
It would be labor intensive by the sites but I think the more a site invests in security, the more players would flock to the site.AzdajaD said:Checking each player individually, ID card verification is nothing, talk via Skype at least for 2 minutes, before verification...
The sites could do something like this during each time a player logs onto a site... AND random checks to make sure the player is actually the one playing.
Tammy said:Cameras to record the actual person playing? That seems like a big invasion of privacy that most people would not want to agree to.
I largely agree with most of this. If someone is thinking about giving up their job and become an online poker pro, then the best advice is dont. As we discussed in another thread, online SnGs are more or less capped at 10$ games these days, and cash games are going in the same direction. On smaller sites like 888 Poker you are lucky to find 2 tables of 50NL running these days, and even on PokerStars the high stakes lobby is a desert.pentazepam said:This is probably not a popular view on a poker forum but as I have stated numerous times it's totally impossible to stop cheating online unless you put up cameras in everyone's homes AND play within a closed network.
Maybe an advanced AI that is more intelligent (and of course extremely faster than a human brain) can check for anomalies or perfect play very fast in theory.
But if you use more than one computer when you play you can have another beside you that gives advice in real-time (Real Time Assistant and Real Time Solvers). If you mix in a couple of human-like mistakes it's almost impossible to detect.
We also have collusion between human players and bots that can share hole cards and other information that can give an enormous edge - the more hole cards a game has the bigger the edge for the cheaters.
And regarding posters in this thread and at other sites that have the opinion that the bots are not playing perfectly (yet):
It's not important if the bots win against the best players (yet). What matters is that they win against the recreational players that keep the poker ecosystem alive by depositing money to poker sites.
You can't win much money if you sit around and play against regs all day.
So Live Cash games, even if they have always had cheaters in them as well, are the only way to still earn substantial money at poker.
You can still enjoy playing online if you play for fun and see it as a social game. Or use it as training to be better. Or just enjoy the intellectual challenge.
Levels under 10NL Cash and small stake MTTs are probably relatively safe for now. But bots have been detected at ALL stakes for over 15 years now. Even the lowest stakes as they are less investigated and policed by the players themselves. It is also a good training ground for testing bots.
So to answer the original question: Nothing that the sites do with the technology they have today can make me feel safe from cheaters.
And if someone thinks I exaggerating I want someone to try to make substantial money on 100NL cash or higher and see what happens.
For the ones that can play a lot of freerolls or nanostake for a little extra pocket money: great.
But don't be delusional and think you can work your way up to high stakes just by natural talent. A lot of players online work in teams and groups today, with a lot of technical assistance even at the lowest stakes.
In all areas of life: if money, power, or sex are involved - cheating and corruption will always be present.