GG Poker, the biggest lie of all.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poison91
  • Start date Start date
Poker Orifice said:
E o que você estava representando naquela situação, considerando a forma como jogou a mão?
Sua jogada obviamente o fez pensar "Que diabos ele está representando ali? ... Não faz sentido nenhum. Eu ligo!! 'BOOM!' " "LFG - - VAMOS"
I could have had any pair—maybe even a higher pocket pair. I flopped a set of 4s, but I waited until the river to see if a fourth card that could complete a straight would show up. I found the call with AQ highly suspicious. You’re acting all smug just because I lost the hand, but I’d like to see who else would make a call like that—with such a small pot and both of us sitting on such deep stacks. In a $50 tournament, I highly doubt you’d ever make that call with AQ.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Poker Orifice
Sunz of Beaches said:
GG allowed previously banned players who did minor stuff against TOS or were banned for bumunting to comeback if they apply.

He probably read somewhere about it and misunderstood the topic thinking his freerolls and micro games are now full with all kinds of cheats that were allowed back 😅
The translator says "se achando" [acting full of oneself], which isn't the specific slang term I meant to use—but I hope you understood what I meant.
 
rei signo said:
The translator says "se achando" [acting full of oneself], which isn't the specific slang term I meant to use—but I hope you understood what I meant.
I wasnt talking to you.

And sorry but u got completely owned in that AQ hand. "I could i could i could" ... but u didnt! U would be surprised how good certain players play on midstakes+. He just figured u have tons of bluffs there on that board and as last player to act. Super risky yes, especially with 4 players in the hand but he was right. That hand is no reason to cry foul play.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fundiver199
rei signo said:
I could have had any pair—maybe even a higher pocket pair. I flopped a set of 4s, but I waited until the river to see if a fourth card that could complete a straight would show up. I found the call with AQ highly suspicious. You’re acting all smug just because I lost the hand, but I’d like to see who else would make a call like that—with such a small pot and both of us sitting on such deep stacks. In a $50 tournament, I highly doubt you’d ever make that call with AQ.

I'm betting he made the call because he weighed the situation out and figured he had you beat... VS. that he could somehow see your holecards.
(flopped trips and waited... to let a straight draw catch up and hit? Yah. that makes sense.).
 
Poker Orifice said:
I'm betting he made the call because he weighed the situation out and figured he had you beat... VS. that he could somehow see your holecards.
(flopped trips and waited... to let a straight draw catch up and hit? Yah. that makes sense.).
It certainly makes sense—having a middle pair in your hand, and perhaps even pairing up with one of the cards on the board!
 
Sunz of Beaches said:
Eu não estava falando com você.

Sinto muito, mas você foi completamente derrotado naquela mão de AQ. "Eu podia, eu podia, eu podia..." mas você não fez! Você ficaria surpreso com o quão bem certos jogadores jogam em apostas médias ou maiores. Ele simplesmente percebeu que você tinha muitos blefes naquele bordo e que, como último jogador a agir, era uma jogada muito arriscada. Sim, foi super arriscado, especialmente com 4 jogadores na mão, mas ele estava certo. Essa mão não é motivo para reclamar de jogo sujo.
I know you think it was just a read on a bluff (which is what happened), but given the size of the pot, the size of my bet, and the way the entire tournament was being played—not to mention that this was a real-money game, not a freeroll—risking a call based on a read that it was a bluff is actually quite atypical, and it made me suspicious!
 
I totally agree. GGPoker always destroys me on the river, way too many times. And the strangest thing is, 4 players got a pocket pair. It's like a bad joke.
 
Back
Top