Regular structure is always going to be better (why I prefer them to answer OP actual question) in the long run. Fast structure like turbos encourage a much wider opening range on those initiating aggression. However, we can't forget that it also forces opening up among those responding to those raises. So more of the 6,7's - J,10's etc. sucking out against A's, K's etc, so even if you're catching cards in a turbo, you're more vulnerable. If you're not catching cards, you're still forced to play at some point.
So regular is my choice of the day.
So regular is my choice of the day.
Last edited:
Simply slow is like when you like to spend some time to have good hands but might be a higher chance to build stacks also higher chances to win the tournament if you play it carefully, while turbo for people who like to finish it as fast as they can but its higher risk tournaments.
Either both have their pros and cons.
Either both have their pros and cons.
Hi all
Luvepoker said:
EvertonGirl said:
igroksash said:
MishkaZL said:
Risto234 said:
0546474 said:
franken222 said:
57noona said:
Slow tournaments in terms of the level of good players are very similar to Omaha, as good or professional players do not take risks for a pair or double pair, especially if the tournament is Freeze-Out, or even if pair ace is served to them they do not care about it, but rely on Always on the turn and the river, and also rely on the skill of reading the opponent and the submarine, and here the weak fish fall into their nets easilyShrops said:
Oh man... I definitely prefer blinds of 10 minutes or more.
The rush of time eating your BB is not one of my favorite things.
A turbo tournament is good for small fields like 200 to 400 entries. Even so, I still prefer it to be a deepstack turbo.
The rush of time eating your BB is not one of my favorite things.
A turbo tournament is good for small fields like 200 to 400 entries. Even so, I still prefer it to be a deepstack turbo.