I agree with all of you but,
Does the fact that he is opening 33% of his hand's not mean anything? I am 3 betting for value to be honest and when he min 4 bets,i dont really feel like he is really doing this to inflate the pot.( i get the feeling hes trying to see where he is at,cause people with stats like that have great imagination).
I check flop to go for a little pot control and then when the King comes up on the turn, he goes for like 30%. Is that the type of bet that someone with these stats and a nutted or semi-nutted hand is going to bet? Maybe yea, but it feels like a bluff.
then on the river, again, he bets 30%. He has 5 Dollars behind and he is only betting like 2.65$. The pot is already 6.10$. Why is he betting so little? It must be clear to him that we are both commited. I felt that i could get a fold by shoving as my hand probably doesnt have enough showdown value as he could have QQ, or best case scenario just air.
I DO NOT like my play here and it IS spewy but im not making this play against a nit. I'm making it against someone who is very likely to be bluffing, hence the play.
All in all, this is not a line i follow regularly.. Reason i posted it was to prove that i follwed my HUD dependent read and it worked out. Usually these plays costs us our stack,no doubt. But now and then if villain looks kinda Over-aggro, i like to mix it up a bit. Is this wrong?