Yaaa ofcourse blackjack for menajisami said:Those two games have a lot of similarities. But:
-- Which one is more fun to play?
-- Which one would you prefer to play if you had a nice bankroll?
-- Which one can make you more money if you happen to have a nice streak?
Kerasuss28 said:Yaaa ofcourse blackjack for me
maronza1 said:I will go with blackjack because it is the game which has the lowest house edge if played correctly
I’d go for Blackjack myself. But Baccarat is definitely more exciting. However, if my bankroll were large enough, I might take a chance and go for Baccarat. But in the long run, it’s got to be Blackjack.najisami said:Those two games have a lot of similarities. But:
-- Which one is more fun to play?
-- Which one would you prefer to play if you had a nice bankroll?
-- Which one can make you more money if you happen to have a nice streak?
SPANKYSN said:I have never played Baccarat, so my understanding of the rules and strategy is severely limited…with blackjack, the player can get close to 50/50 odds. Card counting in blackjack is NOT illegal…casinos don’t want you to do it because it cuts into profits. I have never heard that baccarat has good odds. I think I’ll stick with what I know…blackjack.
dreamer13 said:Baccarat is a unique game. It's primarily suitable for experienced gamblers willing to take risks and place large bets.Blackjack is more appealing than baccarat in many ways. Primarily because in this game, players don't rely on luck, but rather decide the outcome of the game themselves.
jaymfc said:Blackjack has always been my casino game. I can usually double my money
In a couple of hours, and enjoy the crowds. never played baccarat for real money,
but Phil Ivey won 10 million, and you and many others can make 5000 nightly,
but I like to make my own decisions, so I will stick to blackjack.
MishkaZL said:I’d go for Blackjack myself. But Baccarat is definitely more exciting. However, if my bankroll were large enough, I might take a chance and go for Baccarat. But in the long run, it’s got to be Blackjack.
Yeah, it's so unfair, but the problem is that you're on their premises. And that gives them the right to ban whoever they want.martinlgs said:I like Blackjack, but I count cards and calculate...
It's the stupidest rule in casinos. You can calculate and count, but if you never win, they don't ban you. Only when you have a good run, add up your winnings by calculating and counting, and they kick you out of the casino.
Marcwantstowin said:I prefer Blackjack. I've never played Baccarat, but I have read over the threads that Chris posted for it. Interesting, and next time I go to a casino, I will open Chris's thread on my phone and see if I can make sense of it at a table.
Good luck all, whatever you play. 👍
And you're probably right. At least you have some control as opposed to Baccarat where all you have to do is place a bet and watch the cards fall.Igor G said:I reckon I’ve got a better chance of a good result at blackjack.
Totally right. And there are also the splits and the double-downs. Blackjack is definitely a lot more fun to play, you don't risk being bored that's for sure.R.Melnyk77 said:Blackjack has its advantages.
In Blackjack, there are several stages where you make decisions that will affect the outcome. In Baccarat, you simply place a bet and then it’s out of your hands. Blackjack also offers additional betting options. In Blackjack, for the ‘Blackjack’ combination, you can receive a payout greater than 1:1. The advantages are clear. I would choose blackjack.
Yeah, I could consider Baccarat as a pure gambling game, just like roulette or slots where you don't really need to do anything but bet (Spin) and wait.MK_ said:I think the odds are fairly even for both games, ... I like blackjack more because there's more strategy
for the player, baccarat is fun but kinda plays itself so not much for me to do, .... same reason I don't
play slots much, it's just pushing a button.... do I even need to be there really🤷