During my first year of playing poker, I was tossing around what to choose. And I came to the conclusion that I like MTT better. The cache started to make me sick. Just boring. MTT is more interesting, there is more risk, more emotions.
Hi 🙂ChemfromUKR said:During my first year of playing poker, I was tossing around what to choose. And I came to the conclusion that I like MTT better. The cache started to make me sick. Just boring. MTT is more interesting, there is more risk, more emotions.
The key to playing any MTT for ROI is volume---If you are playing freerolls you want to play any you have access to regardless of how often some bad player sucks out on you. The focus in poker is winning money not hands so it does not matter how many times we lose in freerolls because they do not cost us anything.fefibecerra said:I really like to play MTT, but the problem with freerolls is that people don't really know what they are doing. So I'd recommend playing the Cards chat freerolls, which at least has players that are already studying the game.
A MTT bankroll of 20 buy-ins is to low- for cash sure but sng's need 100 and MTT need 200 or more to deal with variance.martDdart said:MTT ,start building a bankroll and get experience playing freerolls.Once you feel comfortable as a winning player at the tables and have a bankroll that is at least 20 times the buyin,try diffrent sit n gos,cashgames ,MTT tournaments and focus on keeping playing the form of poker you enjoy most.
Even for cash games that is very aggressive. Maybe you can play 5NL with $100 (did that myself), but you need to be ready to move down, if you start losing. And without waiting to long. And as you move up, you definitly want to have more than 20 BIs. Maybe 30 for 10NL, 40 for 25NL and 50 for 50NL and above.eetenor said:A MTT bankroll of 20 buy-ins is to low- for cash sure
SnGs (single table) dont have that much more variance than cash games, since typically 1 in 2-3 players cash, and the cashes are not that different. So for me 50 BIs is enough. Maybe more at high stakes, but high stakes SnGs dont even really run regularly these days. But again you need to move down, if you lose. Its fine to play $5 games with $275, but if you have a losing session, and now you are down to $235, then it $2 or $3 games next session.eetenor said:but sng's need 100
For professional and high stakes players sure. But with a small bankroll this is also very conservative. If you play a variety of buyins, like maybe $2,2-5,5, its fine to only have $550 or 100 x your highest buyin. Then if you drop to $510, you play $2,2-4,4 and so on and so forth. I have never had any significant downswings like losing half my bankroll using this system, and that is over thousinds of games.eetenor said:and MTT need 200 or more to deal with variance. Some players who run well early can get away with short BR but 50% of players need the MTT 200 or more regardless of their skill advantage in each game.
It depends on how "beginner" you are. If you a really starting out of scratch, I would only recommend to play Freerolls, until you have at least build a couple of money to yourself. When we are beginner we are not playing too much either way: we are going to spend most of our time studying poker. If we do play 2 hours per day, we ar going to study 4 hours.ChemfromUKR said:During my first year of playing poker, I was tossing around what to choose. And I came to the conclusion that I like MTT better. The cache started to make me sick. Just boring. MTT is more interesting, there is more risk, more emotions.