F
fundiver199
Legend
Loyaler
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2019
- Total posts
- 16,853
- Awards
- 2
- Poker Chips
- 1,237
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #76
Yes I think, thats pretty much it. According to these same people 888 Poker is a fantastic site with a bright future, even though they only have a fraction of the activity, that PokerStars still have. But PokerStars will go bankrupt, because they cancelled some freerolls, that people felt entitled to.hardongear said:Most those that are pissed and saying it's a terrible site are just pissed they got rid of the freerolls and aren't players that ever deposited or likely paid a dime of rake.
I kind of agree with that. Raising the rake for single table SnGs a few years back only hastened the decline of these games, and a lot of them are now completely gone, including all the remaining regular speed games. It also sticks out like a sore thumb, that they raised the rake for all MTTs below $20 a decade ago, especially now that they are no longer the industry leader. Being more expensive than your competitors is difficult to justify, when you constantly lose market share and have to reduce the guarantied price pool of most of your tournaments.hardongear said:With all that said I do wish someone else would buy Pokerstars I'm willing to gamble they could run it better then the company that currently does cause while it's still obviously one of the best sites to play on the owner hasn't done much good to help it.
Other decisions have been more reasonable though. For instance I like the new 32-man On Demand games, so at least SnG grinders now have those. And I also like the random seating for cash games, which I think, is a far better solution, than many other sites have chosen in their attempt to combat excessive table selection. And they regularly update their tournament schedule and include new formats like Mystery Bounty etc. So its not all bad, but it could be better as well.








