icemonkey9 said:For you kids at 25nl this is what you look forward to at 50nl. I don't remember the level being this bad but it is. Definitely a big step below 100nl.
Isn't this like 100% standard given he's only 40 blinds deep?
icemonkey9 said:For you kids at 25nl this is what you look forward to at 50nl. I don't remember the level being this bad but it is. Definitely a big step below 100nl.
c9h13no3 said:Stop playing full ring...
dsvw56;11 22034 said:Isn't this like 100% standard given he's only 40 blinds deep?
eNTy said:I don't do better at 6max over a micro sample though.
dsvw56 said:Bump . . . .
Tried 10NL again this morning. Went great, 400 hands +$27. Had KK>QQ for stacks within like the first 20 hands. If he showed up with AA again, I probably would have thrown my monitor out the window. So hopefully goodbye 5nl, and hello 10NL and SilverStar.
kleitches said:Nice dude, I'm pretty much where you're at, if I don't run good the next time I take a stab at 10nl I might have to get violent.
Just curious, you plan on sticking with 6-max for the next couple of limits you play? I'm contemplating switching to FR once I move up to 10nl but I'm not sure if that would bore me to death. Also, how many buy-ins you got for 10nl?
I knew i shouldnt download this.slycbnew said:March sucks.
For PT users - there's an app that you can find in the PT forum called Holdem Luck (free) that measures your actual performance against your EV when you're all in. I attached a graph for my Feb through March (couldn't figure out how to just put the image here).
Two interesting things from this graph, I think -
1. In general, I'm making positive Ev moves when I'm going all in (green line "expected value" going up), though there are a series of negative Ev moves I made on March 11-12 (I was on a serious tilt).
2. In general, I did something to really piss off the poker gods from about Feb 21 through March 8 (blue line "actual value" is below green line "expected value", red line "difference" going down).
sindri_93 said:But this a kinda pointless program seeing how all-in ev is only a tiny part of the luck involved in poker.
BelgoSuisse said:yes and no. all-in ev is a somewhat better indicator of how good you play than the $ earned. It's still very far away from reliable, but it's better than$ earned, and so it's a relevant metric to follow.
NineLions said:A better indicator, but I've always been a little leery of it too.
When I was short stacking, the all-in EV was almost always going up, because I was choosing situations to be all-in where I was pretty sure I was ahead. Easier to do when you're playing nitty short.
But even full stacked, if a player plays weak rather than aggressive I suspect their all-in EV line is going to be upward all the time as well because they're afraid to get all-in unless they're pretty sure they're ahead.
BelgoSuisse said:I don't think you understand how the all-in EV line is computed.
NineLions said:Measuring only hands where one person is all-in at the point in the hand when that person is all in and who was ahead at that point? Compared against who ends up winning the hand?
No if its a 10$ pot and you are a 80% favorite and win the pot you are running 2$ above EV because your real equity was only 8$ but u won 10$NineLions said:Measuring only hands where one person is all-in at the point in the hand when that person is all in and who was ahead at that point? Compared against who ends up winning the hand?
zachvac said:To expand on what Belgo said, think of if you get money in as an 80% favorite. Even though you got it in good, it's still a suckout when you win as you were supposed to only win 80% of the pot but you won 100% of it. Think about it this way and hopefully you'll see why ev line should always converge to money won line regardless of how often you get it in good.
BelgoSuisse said:no, it measures all hands, but replaces the $ results by the ev for the all-in hands.
sindri_93 said:Oh and you run bad in all-in pots. What limit are u playing?
dsvw56 said:ahhh, yes. 6-max. It pretty much all applies to FR except for the shortstack things.
orangepeeleo said:How many tables do you play at a time??